Mitsubishi Ki-46 "Dinah"
 
Topics:
For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color *PIC*
Paint Formulae: Iron vs Aluminum Surfaces?
Early Ki 46 - II : anyone have pics ?
ki46 wheel well detail
Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker
Dinah and the IJNAF
Dinah bombs?    
Blue Dinah or Brown?  
Ki 46-III units  
Dinah demarkation  
A question on white Ki-46 III of 19th...  
KI 46 Details  
Dinah Interior color (New)
For what it's worth/SAC green (New)
The Color of Dinah! Part 2 *PIC* (New)
The Color of Dinah! Part 1 *PIC* (New)
Earth Brown paint for Dinah III ? (New)
Chokkyo and Dinah Ops in Malaya (New)
 
For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color *PIC*
 
Posted By: James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
Date: Sunday, 24 December 2000, at 7:20 a.m.
 
I thought that the members of the Japanese Army Aircraft Message Board would enjoy a color vignette of a Mitsubishi Ki-46 Dinah taken at Clark Field, February 1945.
Compliments, at Christmas time, of the Japanese Navy Aircraft Message Board at J-Dot Com via the Albert F. Makiel Collection and LRA.
Editors note: The picture is not reproduced here.
 
Re:Ki-46 Color/Effects of Weathering *PIC*
 
Posted By: James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
Date: Monday, 25 December 2000, at 8:02 a.m.
 
Below you will see a scan from the fin of a Mitsubishi Ki-46 Dinah. This relic came from Ki-46 s/n 2406 and was collected from a No.76 dokuritsu hiko chutai wreck at But A/F, New Guinea by Charles DARBY in December 1972. It has been preserved since that time.
Please note the effect of weathering. The original paint has faded to a chalky, almost white-gray surface as a result of binder deterioration and pigment fade.
However, wherever the protective layer of yellow paint from the unit insignia has subsequently chipped off, the finish underneath has remained virtually unchanged. It is somewhat glossy hairyokushoku (gray-green) which is a close match to FS-16350. This was also true of the paint under removable panels which had been protected from the elements.
The primer coat under the final paint application was a very dark flat gunmetal gray. This wreck also demonstrated a field-applied "squiggle" pattern of IJA olive drab (close to FS-34088) on the upper surfaces.
The Clark Field Dinah in my original posting may have also been very weathered, but not to the same extent as this sample.
Editors Note: Picture not reproduced here
 
Re: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color
 
Posted By: Tony Feredo <aferedo@ibahn.net>
Date: Monday, 25 December 2000, at 3:30 a.m.
 
In Response To: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color *PIC* (James F. Lansdale)
 
Great photo... What is the color scheme of this a/c (JA army green over JA grey or NMF?) What unit used this a/c?
 
Re:Ki-46 Color/Effects of Weathering *PIC*
 
Posted By: James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
Date: Monday, 25 December 2000, at 8:02 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color (Tony Feredo)
 
Below you will see a scan from the fin of a Mitsubishi Ki-46 Dinah. This relic came from Ki-46 s/n 2406 and was collected from a No.76 dokuritsu hiko chutai wreck at But A/F, New Guinea by Charles DARBY in December 1972. It has been preserved since that time.
Please note the effect of weathering. The original paint has faded to a chalky, almost white-gray surface as a result of binder deterioration and pigment fade.
However, wherever the protective layer of yellow paint from the unit insignia has subsequently chipped off, the finish underneath has remained virtually unchanged. It is somewhat glossy hairyokushoku (gray-green) which is a close match to FS-16350. This was also true of the paint under removable panels which had been protected from the elements.
The primer coat under the final paint application was a very dark flat gunmetal gray. This wreck also demonstrated a field-applied "squiggle" pattern of IJA olive drab (close to FS-34088) on the upper surfaces.
The Clark Field Dinah in my original posting may have also been very weathered, but not to the same extent as this sample.
Editors note: The picture is not reproduced here.
 
Re: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color
 
Posted By: James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
Date: Monday, 25 December 2000, at 7:08 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color (Tony Feredo)
 
I do not know which unit this aircraft was attached to.
The finish appears to be FS-36357 upper surfaces and a lighter lower surface color with a straight line separation of the upper surpace from the lower surface ("a la" Mitsubishi Ki-67 Peggy scheme).
Color photography cannot be used to determine exact hues, but it does give a clue to the original color/s. Dinahs appeared in the greatest range of, apparently, factory-applied schemes I have catalogued.
Is it possible that Dinah schemes "may" have been "custom-ordered" from Mitsubishi for specific units and/or theaters?
 
Re: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color
 
Posted By: Joern Leckscheid <Joern.Leckscheid@t-online.de>
Date: Monday, 25 December 2000, at 8:59 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color (James F. Lansdale)
 
I have recently come up with a slightly unusual sounding theory as to the upper cammo paint used by Mitsubishi late in the war. As the company also manufactured tanks for the Army (Chi-Ha etc.), is it possible some tank greens and browns were also applied to later production examples of the Ki-46 and the Ki-67 at factory level? The paint used seems to have a matte appearance on the planes, same as on tanks. I don´t really know much about tank colors, so is it a possibility?
 
Paint Formulae: Iron vs Aluminum Surfaces?
 
Posted By: James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
Date: Monday, 25 December 2000, at 11:51 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color (Joern Leckscheid)
 
Your theory sound good to me. It sure would have been expedient! My only question would be; does it make any difference in adherence of the paint if the paint was formulated for application to an iron surface (tanks) and then also used for application to an aluminum surface? I guess it might not matter if the proper primer were used. I need someone better versed in this subject than I am!
 
Re: Paint Formulae: Iron vs Aluminum Surfaces?
 
Posted By: Joern Leckscheid <Joern.Leckscheid@t-online.de>
Date: Monday, 25 December 2000, at 4:25 p.m.
 
In Response To: Paint Formulae: Iron vs Aluminum Surfaces? (James F. Lansdale)
 
And up pops the primer question once again! Any indication if Ki-46s and Ki-67s (Mitsubishi-built) were primed ´til the end? The thought of commonly used paints occured to me when I noticed that Gunze Mr. Color 132, "Earth Green", a tank color, looks suspicously like the color of the Ki-67 on the cover of MA 533. So who out there in j-aircraft.com land knows anything about Japanese tank colors?
 
Re ki 46 colours
 
Posted By: JC Carbonel <jc.carbonel@free.fr>
Date: Thursday, 28 December 2000, at 1:59 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Paint Formulae: Iron vs Aluminum Surfaces? (Joern Leckscheid)
 
while we are speculating on ki 46 colours here is an idea (maybe a silly idea):
looking at the pics on page 63 of FAOW 38 I was surprised that the structure of the aircraft was visible while the aircraft appeared painted and I wondered if it could happen that an aircraft delivered in natural metal could be painted (on the field) in Aotake overrall ? This would probably give this see-through structure effect and could explain the various blue (especially the medium blue) aircraft (notably ki 46) in the Thorpe book .
Is this totally crazy or what ?
 
Early Ki 46 - II : anyone have pics ?
 
Posted By: François P.WEILL <frpawe@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sunday, 8 October 2000, at 12:54 p.m.
 
I have just bought the two Ki 46 Kits from Hasegawa (I'm a bit late to do so I know :))) ).
I've reviewed whatever photographic documentation I have and I discovered that despite the fact the first Ki 46 - II's were produced around December 1941 (the few used before were the little known or represented Ki 46 - I's)I have no pics of of early Ki 46 - II but one (I suppose because the are represented in the same line as the earlier ki 15 - II) from the 2nd Sentai ...
Hasegawa includes a decal for one a.c. of this Sentai but represents it having the yellow IFF stripes on the wings...
I suspect those on the pics I've located didn't carry them when it was shot but ... And I have no idea where the second Sentai operated...
Anyone knows ?
I'd really like to built mine as a 1942 - 1943 period aircraft and beside the 2nd Sentai option, any good pic of an early Ki 46 - II in operational use, depicting the markings clearly enough will be welcome...
 
Re: Early Ki 46 - II : anyone have pics ?
 
Posted By: Elephtheriou George <elgeorge@otenet.gr>
Date: Sunday, 8 October 2000, at 1:56 p.m.
 
In Response To: Early Ki 46 - II : anyone have pics ? (François P.WEILL)
 
I think you definetely need the FAOW 38. There, you can find photos, profiles and many other things that are useful for building your model. (Photos of the Ki 46-I too).Also take a look at the "Emblems of the Rising Sun" for unit markings.
Hope it helps,
 
Re: Early Ki 46 - II : anyone have pics ?
 
Posted By: Deniz Karacay <denizkaracay@yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, 8 October 2000, at 2:40 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Early Ki 46 - II : anyone have pics ? (Elephtheriou George)
 
I have FAOW Ki46 issue but don't remember the number. It has black cover. If you tell me the pages for the photos Francois wanted I'll scan and send him.
 
ki46 wheel well detail
 
Posted By: Demirhan Denizyaran <dfdenizyaran@hotmail.com>
Date: Sunday, 24 September 2000, at 3:22 p.m.
 
I need Ki-46 wheel well details,can anybody help me please?
 
Re: ki46 wheel well detail
 
Posted By: Charles Metz <c-metz@uchicago.edu>
Date: Wednesday, 4 October 2000, at 12:42 p.m.
 
In Response To: ki46 wheel well detail (Demirhan Denizyaran)
 
Ki-46 wheelwell detail can be found in:
Ashley: 'Mitsubishi Ki-46 "Dinah"' (Aircraft in Detail series, No. 1; Delta Aviation Publishing [UK], 1997; 32 pages; US$15) -- page 23
and in:
------: 'Mitsubishi Ki-46' (Maru Mechanic series, No. 13; Maru [Japan], 1978; in Japanese; 80 pages; approximate value US$30 [out of print]) -- pages 24-27.
Although these books are out of print, they're well worth searching for, in my opinion. The Maru Mechanic has been reprinted in "Mechanism of Military Aircraft #4" and is offered for sale on HobbyLink Japan's on-line catalog page at (http://www.hlj.com/cgi-local/manmenu2.cgi?manufacture=KJS), for example.
 
Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker
 
Posted By: Frank Chr. Berger <frank_berger@directbox.com>
Date: Friday, 25 August 2000, at 1:20 p.m.
 
Who can tell me something about the quality of this kit? Did they score against allied planes or were they simple more "fodder"?
As far as i know one decal option is a attacker used in Manschuria and Japan.Action against russian troops? I have a cool 1/48 T34/85 and want to combine it on a diorama with a downed IJAA aircraft.
 
Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker
 
Posted By: DANIS Jean-Charles <amar.derni@cfwb.be>
Date: Monday, 18 September 2000, at 11:45 p.m.
 
In Response To: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker (Frank Chr. Berger)
 
Does anyone knows if this Ki-46 version (with the large gun protruding from the roof) was produced in large numbers or was it an experimental version, built in small numbers,like the Ki-109 (Ki-67 with 75mm gun in the nose),soon to be released by Hasegawa.
 
Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker
 
Posted By: JC Carbonel <jean-christophe.carbonel@laposte.fr>
Date: Monday, 25 September 2000, at 8:25 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker (DANIS Jean-Charles)
 
It seems the conversion of the Dinah to night-fighter version was not too successfull indeed but our dear William Green claims it was produced in "substantial numbers" and Francillon gives 10 different units (sentai) operating it from July 1944 (doubts since himself he says the proto flew in October 44)see Profile n°82.
 
Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker
 
Posted By: Ted Bradstreet <tbstreet@uninets.net>
Date: Tuesday, 5 September 2000, at 9:13 a.m.
 
In Response To: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker (Frank Chr. Berger)
 
I'm not sure exactly which version you are asking about. The "air defense fighter" (interceptor) armed with the upward-pointing 37 mm Ho-204 was "ineffective" (no known scores).
 
Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker
 
Posted By: Frank Chr. Berger <frank_berger@directbox.com>
Date: Tuesday, 5 September 2000, at 12:36 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker (Ted Bradstreet)
 
i'm interested in both.But since there were even less ground support Ki-46s (only the 20mms + bombracks) than interceptors-they did have even fewer chances to score any kills,i think! Do you have informations about kills/losses of Ki-67,H8K? I'm interested in following types(Ki-84,Ki-61,Ki-100,B6N1/2)
Which ones are your favoured?
 
Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker
 
Posted By: Ted Bradstreet <tbstreet@uninets.net>
Date: Tuesday, 5 September 2000, at 2:51 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker (Frank Chr. Berger)
 
Sorry. My interest is really the guns, so I only know about aircraft that carried guns I have studied.
 
Dinah and the IJNAF
 
Posted By: Grant Goodale <mailto:grant.goodale@sympatico.ca?subject=Dinah and the IJNAF>
Date: Thursday, 23 August 2001, at 7:13 a.m.
 
Hello world -
The posting on the General forum about the new Hasegawa releases tweaked my interest. They state that they will be releasing a Ki-46 with IJN markings. I was looking in the A6M Zero in Action book and they also show a photo of a Dinah parked in with Zeroes. The caption identifies it as a Ki-46 assigned to the IJNAF.
Were these Dinahs actually in IJN Kokutai service or were they special IJAAF units attached to a certain base? If they were true IJN birds, does anyone know what units they served with?
TIA
- Grant
 
Re: Dinah and the IJNAF
 
Posted By: Allan Alsleben <mailto:Wildcat42@AOL.com?subject=Re: Dinah and the IJNAF>
Date: Thursday, 23 August 2001, at 4:15 p.m.
 
In Response To: Dinah and the IJNAF (Grant Goodale)
 
Hello Grant,
The earliest unit I'm aware of was the 76 FCS or Independent Chutai operating over Guadalcanal or the HQ unit of the Brigade. When they mention HQ unit, I believe they are speaking of the Brigade. It was Army, and the overflights were for Army information. The 76FCS used the same strips that the IJN used while at Rabaul.
As far as I'm aware of, I've never heard of any Naval Unit being equipped with Ki 46, as the Navy had the Type 2 Reconnaissance ("Irving") airplane.
FYI - Allan
 
Re: Dinah and the IJNAF
 
Posted By: Jim Broshot
Date: Thursday, 23 August 2001, at 10:09 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Dinah and the IJNAF (Allan Alsleben)
 
Al:
I am going to guess that this line may be based on (who else) Francillon. In Profile No. 82 he states that the IJNAF acquired "a small number" of Ki-46s. No exact date given, Then he states, "Some JNAF Ki-46-IIs, flying from Timor Island, were active over Northern Australia." No date and no unit given. The same statements are repeated in his JAPANESE AIRCRAFT OF THE PACIFIC WAR.
 
Re: Dinah and the IJNAF
 
Posted By: Larry <mailto:Hldeziv@aol.com?subject=Re: Dinah and the IJNAF>
Date: Friday, 24 August 2001, at 6:33 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Dinah and the IJNAF (Allan Alsleben)
 
Guys -
There were a couple of units: 151 Ku had "a few" Ki-46 DINAHs during 1943 at Rabaul-Lakunai, and on 26 March 1944 it still had one on strength that was serviceable. This is from Mikesh/Tagaya (Moonlight Interceptor: Japan's IRVING Night Fighter) and Sakaida (The Siege of Rabaul, p.27).
Also, 171 Ku is said to have had "a few" Ki-46 DINAHs at Kanoya NAS in May-July 1945 along with a larger number of C6N MYRTs. 171 Ku flew L-R maritime reconnaissance searches as well as radio countermeasures and deception flights for the Kikusui special attack missions under 5th Air Fleet. This is from SRH-055 in Record Group 457/National Archives (Top Secret ULTRA sigint material).
HTH
(Larry)
 
Re: Kudos to Larry and Rick
 
Posted By: Allan Alsleben <mailto:Wildcat42@AOL.com?subject=Re: Kudos to Larry and Rick>
Date: Friday, 24 August 2001, at 8:23 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Dinah and the IJNAF (Larry)
 
Hi guys,
I knew that if anyone could provide an answer, you both could. I just didn't have enough material to say one way or the other.
Other than 151, 202 and possibly 171, would it be too muchg to ask what other units?? I've noted those mentioned with your source.
Al
 
Re: Kudos to Larry and Rick
 
Posted By: Elephtheriou George <mailto:arawasi_g@hotmail.com?subject=Re: Kudos to Larry and Rick>
Date: Friday, 24 August 2001, at 9:10 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Kudos to Larry and Rick (Allan Alsleben)
 
Konnichi wa,
from FAOW 38, page 39, top photo:
photo taken end of Showa 17 (1942) at Rabaul airfield. The Navy received a few Dinahs which opperated in the South Areas and the Mainland among others. This Model II is camouflaged in deep green and has yellow IFFs on the wing's leading edges. It opperated recon. missions over Guadalcanal and P/N.G. areas.
Domo,
George
 
Re: Dinah and the IJNAF
 
Posted By: richard dunn <mailto:rdunn@rhsmith.umd.edu?subject=Re: Dinah and the IJNAF>
Date: Friday, 24 August 2001, at 7:57 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Dinah and the IJNAF (Larry)
 
All
Emphatically "yes" the Navy operated Ki 46's. In addition to 151 Ku as noted by Larry on, March 1st 1943 the 23d Air Flotilla requested two Ki 46's with crews to be assigned to 202 Ku. The Type 2 land recon a/c did not have the high altitude performance to operate over Australia.
I'd have to check my records for other units operating the type. But definite on 151 Ku and probably 202.
Rick
 
Re: Dinah and the IJNAF
 
Posted By: John Lundstrom <mailto:jl@mpm.edu?subject=Re: Dinah and the IJNAF>
Date: Monday, 27 August 2001, at 10:09 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Dinah and the IJNAF (richard dunn)
 
The Dinahs that operated from Rabaul in October 1942 against Guadalcanal were definitely flown by the JAAF's 76th Independent Air Squadron. One (flown by Capt. Kirita Hideo, the chutai leader) crashed on 25 October right on Henderson Field. Souvenir hunters swarmed the wreck and only about ten days later it was noticed that the flight helmets bore the Army star. Consequently on 8 November 42 Halsey warned Nimitz that the IJA had planes in the South Pacific Area.
 
Dinah bombs?
 
Posted By: Ryan Boerema <ryann1k2j@aol.com>
Date: Monday, 25 March 2002, at 5:18 p.m.
 
I periodically come across the Ki-46, "Dinah," referred to as a fighter-bomber, or bomber, or otherwise claims that it sometimes toted bombs. I've never seen a photo of one doing so or of a bomb rack on a Dinah's underside. Does anyone know?
 
Re: Dinah bombs?
 
Posted By: Hiroyuki Takeuchi
Date: Monday, 25 March 2002, at 9:15 p.m.
 
In Response To: Dinah bombs? (Ryan Boerema)
 
Two possible reasons.
 
1)US intelligence report during WW2 states that the Ki46 is also used a a bomber (probably a confusion with Ki45).
 
2)Ki46 interceptors carried two "ta-dan" air-to-air bombs under the wings.
 
I think the Tamiya Ki46 interceptor kit includes the "ta-dan" bombs in the box.
 
Re: Dinah bombs?
 
Posted By: Dan Salamone <heroncreek@pcisys.net>
Date: Tuesday, 26 March 2002, at 9:32 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Dinah bombs? (Hiroyuki Takeuchi)
 
The Tamiya Ki-46III kit does indeed include the "ta-dan" weapons. IIRC, there is a photo in the FAOW that shows an aircraft ready for departure, carrying the weapons as well.
 
Re: fireworks
 
Posted By: Garth O'Connell <goconnell@dingoblue.net.au>
Date: Wednesday, 27 March 2002, at 11:08 p.m.
 
In Response To: Dinah bombs? (Ryan Boerema)
 
Off on a slight tangent, (which may be confused with bombs) was the use of 'fireworks' dropped out of the Dinah to 'scare' or put off attackers - as what occurred over Western Australia in 1943.
 
Re: fireworks
 
Posted By: Hiroyuki Takeuchi
Date: Thursday, 28 March 2002, at 3:26 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: fireworks (Garth O'Connell)
 
Japanese combat reports of the effectiveness of air to air use of ta-dan vary considerably. Some (like Tetsuzo Iwamoto) claim it to be highly effective weapon against heavy bombers while others state that it was too difficult to aim and not very effective in combat (which seems to be the more popular opinion).
 
The fact that its use was continued until the end of the war probably means that it was believed to have some effectiveness, whether in terms of real damage to airframe or as a means to disrupt formation prior to attack by ordinary armament.
 
Blue Dinah or Brown?
 
Posted By: Ryan Boerema <ryann1k2j@aol.com>
Date: Friday, 5 April 2002, at 10:20 a.m.
 
On the General Aircraft board a couple weeks ago Michael Cavcik translated the Polish (http://www.j-aircraft.org/bbs/general_config.pl?read=9094) from a picture posted by Deniz Karacay of a BLUE Dinah III, said to be the last P-47 victory, by a Capt. Smith, 36FS, 8FG, over Hansa Bay, and one of the first Ki-46IIIs in New Guinea.
When I tried to corroborate this in Stanaway & Hickey's "Attack and Conquer," Schiffer, 1995, they write that, indeed, on Feb 6, 1944 Capt. Bob Smith caught the Dinah over Hansa Bay and "fired a single long seven second burst" and his wingman "saw the wing of the Dinah burst into flame and the dark BROWN reconnaissance plane crash below."
Does anyone have the combat report to see which color it was, or did it crash on land and get inspected? Thorpe shows a very similar BLUE Dinah III for New Guinea as well. Is this the same plane with two different color interpretations?
 
One vote for brown
 
Posted By: richard dunn <rdunn@rhsmith.umd.edu>
Date: Friday, 5 April 2002, at 3:25 p.m.
 
In Response To: Blue Dinah or Brown? (Ryan Boerema)
 
Number 3 in Smith's flight was 1st Lt John J. Perkins. He was making a pass at the aircraft when Smith raked it from nose to tail and set it on fire. According to Perkins: "The enemy airplane was of a dark brown color with large roundels on either side of the wings and fuselage."
 
I don't read Polish but Deniz's post seems to indicate this blue aircraft was from 82 chutai. There was no 82 chutai in the 4th Air Army on February 6th, 1944 nor at any other time that Army operated in New Guinea. Don't believe everything you read whether in Polish, Turkish or English.
 
Another wingman 1st Lt George Slingmeyer says nothing about the aircraft's color. If it were blue you think somebody would have mentioned it. How about the lighting? The combat took place at 1220 hours and started above an overcast in clear sky.
 
By the way if anybody knows anything about blue Type 1 fighters (Ki 43) which were captured at Gloucester and Hansa please let me know.
 
Re: One vote for brown
 
Posted By: Ryan Boerema <ryann1k2j@aol.com>
Date: Friday, 5 April 2002, at 5:18 p.m.
 
In Response To: One vote for brown (richard dunn)
 
Well, that settles that. Mr. Cavcik translated the Polish as stating, "Mitsubishi Ki-46-III of 82. independent chutai. One of few planes of this version, that arrived to the New Guinea. After bad success of other reconnaisance units, 82. chutai was tranferred from Manchuria, where it shared airbase (and emblem) with famous 18. sentai."
Oh, those elusive blue aircraft! Dinahs, Oscars, Sonias, Helens, Ki-100s, Ian K. Baker even talks about gorgeous Georges using dark blue camouflage for over-water patrols. Always just out of reach....
 
Re: One vote for brown
 
Posted By: Nick Millman
Date: Saturday, 6 April 2002, at 5:46 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: One vote for brown (Ryan Boerema)
 
I don't think we should be too hasty in using this poor and easily refuted example of a "blue" colour scheme as negative evidence of others. There are plenty of RAF combat reports from Burma describing blue and black Japanese aircraft. For example early in 1944 F/Lt J James of 607 Squadron damaged an Oscar with dark blue paintwork, seeing it sufficiently clearly to note that it’s “very red” roundels were outlined in a darker red.
 
And if colour perception during the stresses of air combat is too unreliable (as is often argued) then F/Lt C D Horsman's painstakingly documented ATAIU examination of abandoned Hayabusas at airstrips on Akyab island in early 1945 ought to convince that blue paint was available - and used. In addition to the expected green mottles over natural metal, the following unusual aircraft were recorded.
 
Airframe 5869, a Hayabusa of the 50th Sentai's 3rd Chutai was found to be camouflaged with a mixed mottle of green, brown, red and blue on all its upper surfaces. The Sentai lightning flash had a thin red edging and there were two white fuselage stripes.
 
Airframe 5672 an Aikoku-Go Hayabusa of the 64th Sentai (donated by an electricity company) was camouflaged in a carefully applied mottle of green and black.
 
Several Japanese sources also maintain that many Army aircraft operating in the China Sea areas received a dark blue colour scheme, described as "kon-iro" by veterans, possibly in connection with preparations for their increased maritime operations along the Chinese coast from January to August 1945.
 
I think the subject deserves further research rather than dismissal.
 
Good Way of Thinking *PIC*
 
Posted By: Deniz Karacay <denizkaracay@yahoo.com>
Date: Thursday, 11 April 2002, at 8:22 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: One vote for brown (Nick Millman)
 
Well here is another one, from SAMI September 2000;
 
Ki43-III Ko, 20th Sentai, 3 Chutai, Formosa
 
Editors note: Picture no longer available
 
blue camo makes sense
 
Posted By: Carlos Sempere <ibiza109@inferno.com>
Date: Thursday, 11 April 2002, at 10:35 p.m.
 
In Response To: Good Way of Thinking *PIC* (Deniz Karacay)
 
I would've liked to have a plane in that color, given the surroundings. Proof or not, I'd be surprised if blue was never used.
 
Ki 46-III units
 
Posted By: Chris Cowx <ccowx@shaw.ca>
Date: Monday, 13 May 2002, at 3:40 p.m.
 
I am wondering if anyone knows anything about where the "Dokuritsu Hikotai, 55th Chutai" operated and when. Same for the "Hiko 10th Sentai, 1st Chutai"
 
Re: Ki 46-III units
 
Posted By: Jim Broshot <jbroshot@fidnet.com>
Date: Monday, 13 May 2002, at 8:26 p.m.
 
In Response To: Ki 46-III units (Chris Cowx)
 
Aircraft in Profile No. 82 (Francillon) has for the following Ki-46 equipped units:
 
10th Sentai: New Guinea, Rabaul, Formosa, Japan; 1943 - 1945
 
55th Dokuritsu Dai Shijugo Chutai: Manchuria, China; Mar 1942 - Oct 1944
 
Re: Ki 46-III units
 
Posted By: Nick Millman
Date: Monday, 13 May 2002, at 11:57 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Ki 46-III units (Jim Broshot)
 
Here's a puzzle:
 
According to Monograph 151 the 55th was transferred from Manchuria to China on 15 February 1944.
 
Trouble is - the unit is not included in any of the lists for Manchurian based units before that! Was it perhaps a product of the dreaded Dinah unit evolution where units were consolidated, formed and re-formed?
 
Re: Ki 46-III units
 
Posted By: Chris Cowx <ccowx@shaw.ca>
Date: Monday, 13 May 2002, at 11:00 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Ki 46-III units (Jim Broshot)
 
Thank you very much! Do you think that the -III's would have served in Rabaul or would they not have entered service until the unit was in Formosa and Japan? I have a picture showing a -II in IJN service in Rabaul about the summer of '43.
 
Re: Ki 46-III units
 
Posted By: Jim Broshot <jbroshot@fidnet.com>
Date: Monday, 13 May 2002, at 11:10 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Ki 46-III units (Chris Cowx)
 
Alas, I am only a rank amateur in this field. Francillon says, "Ki-46-IIIs, often operating alongside Ki-46-IIs, covered the entire South-west Pacific and CBI theatres of operations...." The color profiles of Ki-46-IIIs in the profile are for: 2 Sentai, Philippines, Oct 1944; 81 Sentai, 3 Chutai, Burma 1944; 38 Sentai, Formosa, 1945, and 38 Dokuritsu Hikotai, 2 Chutai, Japan, July - August 1945."
 
Dinah demarkation
 
Posted By: Tracy White <whitet@blarg.net>
Date: Sunday, 26 May 2002, at 11:31 p.m.
 
Any idea if the demarkation lines on Army Dinahs between the top and bottom color would be sharp or feathered? I don't quite trust the RAF museum example...
 
Re: Dinah demarkation
 
Posted By: Don Marsh <marsh44@fuse.net>
Date: Monday, 27 May 2002, at 12:05 a.m.
 
In Response To: Dinah demarkation (Tracy White)
 
You will occassionally find a Dinahs with soft demarcation, but 99% of the time (if they weren't an overall solid color) they appear to have had sharp demarcations. Fairly consistent placment on the fuselage, but a lot of variations in application on the nacelles.
 
A question on white Ki-46 III of 19th...
 
Posted By: Donald Anderson <sundastrait@yahoo.com>
Date: Monday, 17 June 2002, at 5:41 p.m.
 
Independent Chutai 1944 as found in Thorpe's JAAF Camo book on p.135. Does anyone know of the source for this artwork? I haven't been able to locate any photographs in FAOW, Maru Mechanic, Peter Scott's book or the Thorpe book that show this scheme. I'm sure I don't have all the material on the Ki-46 so any other potential sources would be much appreciated.
 
Re: A question on white Ki-46 III of 19th...
 
Posted By: Don Marsh <marsh44@fuse.net>
Date: Tuesday, 18 June 2002, at 3:31 p.m.
 
In Response To: A question on white Ki-46 III of 19th... (Donald Anderson)
 
I've been looking for a photo of this a/c for 4 years now. I believe this to be a speculative art representation without photographic evidence. It may be based on a word of mouth account, some intelligence report, or evolved from confusion regarding a surrender a/c. Frankly, I'm dubious. Too bad, because I like this 19 Independant marking much more than the usual representation.
 
Re: A question on white Ki-46 III of 19th...
 
Posted By: Donald Anderson <sundastrait@yahoo.com>
Date: Wednesday, 19 June 2002, at 7:03 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: A question on white Ki-46 III of 19th... (Don Marsh)
 
Thanks for the j-aircraft.com reply. Yes, I like the all-white scheme as well and thought it interesting given that FAOW only mentions the green/grey, but I wouldn't be surprised if the scheme is speculation either. Just hoping that I overlooked a reference somewhere. I wonder if there is anything like an operational history of the 19th Ind.Chutai available? The Ki-46 FAOW(p.61) mentions that at the time of the Okinawa campaign a section of the 19th served under the control of the IJN's 801 Ku. This makes me wonder further about possible camo schemes. Oh well, keep poking around...
 
KI 46 Details
 
Posted By: jackson <FincherI@aol.com>
Date: Sunday, 23 June 2002, at 11:32 a.m.
 
I'm just putting the finishing touches on a Tamiya KI 46 with the oblique cannon and I have two questions for our distinguished panel. How does the pilot's enclosure open? I believe I have seen pictures of the center section hinging left to right ala Bf109, would this be correct? Does anyone have information or photos of the antenna wire installation?
 
Memory serves me that it may have run fron the cannon mount to the stabilizer.
 
Re: KI 46 Details
 
Posted By: Don Marsh <marsh44@fuse.net>
Date: Sunday, 23 June 2002, at 2:42 p.m.
 
In Response To: KI 46 Details (jackson)
 
Yes, the canopy was hinged on the starboard side of the fuselage, swinging over to the starboard side, allowing postside entry. Similar to the Me 109, as you mention, but... the Ki-46's canopy was also hinged in the top center of the canopy allowing the canopy to sort of fold slightly flatter when swung over to the right. The left side and corners didn't swing up into the air, as on a Me 109, but slid along a track that followed the edge of the fuselage.
 
The antenna set up on this a/c is rather unique. The Antenna was joined to the cannon itself (!) running from the center of the cannon back to the usual location on the vertical fin tip. A small connecting wire runs glazing from the main antenna wire down into the rear compartment through the glazing.
 
I'll send you a couple reference shots.
Dinah Interior color
 
Posted By: Pablo Maloberti <pablogmalo@speedy.com.ar>
Date: Thursday, 19 September 2002, at 11:53 a.m.
 
I'm about to start building Tamiya's recon Dinah and wonder about interior color.
Acording to Tamiya instructions it's all in a yellow-green mix, including wheel wells. But in an article in an old FSM magazine someone painted the inner fusalege in aotake, and the rest (floor, seats...) in the green mix.
So how should it be? Is Tamiya mix ok for the interior color?
 
For what it's worth/SAC green
 
Posted By: Peter, <f14peter@yahoo.com>
Date: Tuesday, 24 September 2002, at 10:52 a.m.
 
In Response To: Dinah Interior color (Pablo Maloberti)
 
I painted the interior of my recon Dinah with MM enamal SAC bomber green. It's a lighter shade of green, not much saturation, and you might say that it has a hint of yellow.
 
I primarily picked it because; It was close enough for me; It's a different shade of green than it seems like all other planes have; And it was on hand. My dedication to color accuracy (If it's close, it's good enough for me) may not be as high as yours, but I was satisfied with the color.
 
Re: Dinah Interior color
 
Posted By: Grant Goodale <grant.goodale@sympatico.ca>
Date: Thursday, 19 September 2002, at 12:03 p.m.
 
In Response To: Dinah Interior color (Pablo Maloberti)
 
Mikesh lists the interior colour as being between FS 34127 and 34098. Since it is a Mitsubishi aircraft, you could either go with the Tamiya mix or else use ModelMaster Medium Green (FS 34102) straight out of the bottle.
 
or Mr.Color126 *No Text*
 
Posted By: Elephtheriou George <arawasi_g@hotmail.com>
Date: Thursday, 19 September 2002, at 8:32 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Dinah Interior color (Grant Goodale)
 
Re: Dinah Interior color
 
Posted By: Dave C. <dvdcl@hotmail.com>
Date: Saturday, 21 September 2002, at 12:48 a.m.
 
In Response To: Dinah Interior color (Pablo Maloberti)
 
Is the Gunze Sangyo FS 34102 Green good also? Or does the Testors Model Master FS 34102 Green a better match? I am also building a Dinah also by the way. About the wheel wells, were they painted interior green also as the Hasagawa kit instructions specify?
 
Re: Dinah Interior color
 
Posted By: Grant Goodale <grant.goodale@sympatico.ca>
Date: Saturday, 21 September 2002, at 7:40 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Dinah Interior color (Dave C.)
 
I do not have that Gunze paint so I cannot comment on the colour matching. However, if both paints claim the same FS number, they *should* be very close.
 
I am not sure about the wheel wells but I think that they should be aotake.
 
Re: Dinah Interior color
 
Posted By: Pablo Maloberti <pablogmalo@speedy.com.ar>
Date: Saturday, 21 September 2002, at 11:14 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Dinah Interior color (Dave C.)
 
I found this pics of a restored Dinah.
http://www.clubhyper.com/reference/dinahdm_1.htm
Here the wheel wells seem to be painted in aotake.
 
The Color of Dinah! Part 2 *PIC*
 
Posted By: James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
Date: Sunday, 8 September 2002, at 2:14 p.m.
 
When the First Air Commando Group (then known as the "5318th Provisional Air Unit") arrived in the CBI theater of operations, armorer, J. Buckley ("Buck") RADER, investigated the wreckage of a Mitsubishi Ki-46 II Dinah that had been shot down by RAF Spitfires. One of these Dinahs (shown below) was attached to the No.18 Dokuristsu Hiko Chutai.
 
Editors note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_2696.jpg
 
Photo: NARA via Buck Rader and LRA.
 
"Buck" souvenired the access door for adjusting the elevator control cable located on the starboard, rear fuselage of the Dinah (as shown in the photograph below, just aft of the so-called "combat stripe"). Note that the round access door has been un-latched and is hanging by the attached chain below the open port.
 
Editors note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_gasmata_b.jpg
 
Photo: Dr. Charles Darby via LRA.
 
Buck submitted this access door for analysis. It measured 8.8 cm.
 
Editors note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_2696_cover_a.jpg
 
The outside surface (as shown above) is painted in a gray-green (hairyokushoku) color which is a close match to FS-14201/16350 (Munsell 5 Y 5/2) with gloss black kanji stencils.
 
Editors note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_2696_cover_b.jpg
 
The inner surface (as shown above) has the letters "SDH" stamped in the metal and it is painted with an opaque, lusterless, dark blue-black primer which is a close match to FS-35042 (Munsell 5 B 2/1).
 
Credit: Special thanks to J. Buckley Rader and Dr. Charles Darby.
 
Re: The Color of Dinah! Errata? *PIC*
 
Posted By: James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
Date: Monday, 16 September 2002, at 4:50 a.m.
 
In Response To: The Color of Dinah! Part 2 *PIC* (James F. Lansdale)
 
Joe PICARELLA, Senior Technical Artist, Flight International Magazine, wrote to say:
 
"Dear Jim,
...
I saw your interesting items on the Ki-46 on J.A.com. I hope that you do not mind me saying but there are several inaccuracies in the description of the item shown.
 
1. The item that you show is wrongly identified as to it's original location. You show it to be the access door aft of frames station 25 (8,350mm). This is actually the "lifting tube" access point, though to be precise there is no lifting tube fitted to the Ki-46. Instead there are two built-up support 'eyes' fitted to the 'working' face of said frame station 25. These eyes were covered by the standard 'snap catch' door found on the Ki-46...
 
While it is true to say that the trim cables do pass near to the Port side access panel, there are in fact no turnbuckles or adjustable connections within working distance. Only a tufnal fairlead is within reach, but this is a fixed item. Either way, aircraft built earlier and later than the one you are referring to carried the "snap catch" cover at this lifting point.
 
2. The Door that you show is marked as 'Control Cable, Balance Tab, Elevator'. The only location that this would be found on the Ki-46 is on the underside of the tailplane...
 
While I am happy with this location, the paint and type of stencil. The shape and size of this panel does cause me some concern. The aircraft you show, C/n 2696, was well along the production run of 'standardised' K-46's. All aircraft right from the prototype carried a mixture of the 'snap catch' type covers or round (11 cm Dia) covers with 'Dzus' fasteners for most access points. While these evolved and migrated around the aircraft over the years, the type you show, with an extended radius (or nipple) containing a 'Dzus' fastener is something that I have never seen on the Ki-46. I have a photo of the tailplane underside of aircraft C/n 2406, (an earlier aircraft) indicating that the 'snap catches'were fitted.
 
While it is possible that this is in fact from the Ki-46, and this would make an interesting side note to the 'access and panels' section of the book, I am worried by it, especially since it does match a control access cover found on the Ki-51 tail cone."
 
I defer to Joe, who knows far more than I about Dinah's anatomy! (;>)
 
Buck RADER may have been mistaken about the aircraft type he souvenired in Burma.
 
Editors note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-51_70fcs.jpg
 
If this access cover came from a Ki-51, a Mitsubishi product, then the colors are still indicative of the color application as used by that firm (shown above; Ki-51 assigned to No.70 Fcs, Hollandia, New Guinea, photo by D.G. Cooper via LRA).
 
However, I am still puzzled by the "holes" (shown in the view below) forward of the hanging cover and the larger one in front of the "combat stripe".
 
Where either of these the "trestle here" openings?
 
The cover I scanned may have come from some other location on the Dinah, perhaps under the horizontal tail plane.
 
Thank you Joe and I look forward to your book about Dinah "with the finah linah"!
 
Credit: AWM via Dr. Charles Darby and LRA
 
Editors note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_gasmata_b.jpg
 
Re: The Color of Dinah! Errata?
 
Posted By: Joe Picarella <joe.picarella@rbi.co.uk>
Date: Monday, 16 September 2002, at 8:26 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: The Color of Dinah! Errata? *PIC* (James F. Lansdale)
 
While I am happy with this "in-field" promotion, the real editor of Flight international, my boss would no doubt be shocked to hear of my promotion and his fall from grace!
 
Re your concern over the rear fuselage apertures and the "trestle here" markings, the prior mentioned frame station 25, acted as the rear fuselage trestle frame.
The fact that the "trestle here" marking is in front of said aperture stems from the fact that the lifting "eyes" were mounted on the working face of this frame, which in the case of frame station 25 is the rear face.
The "trestle here" stencil is therefore directly on top of the frame centre line, with the centre radius of the lifting "eye" (and therefore the centre of the access panel for the lifting "eye") located 10cm aft of this "working" face.
 
In the field, maintenance crews had the option to sit the aircraft on a support stand, positioned under the "trestle here" markings. Alternately, with the use of a lifting tube and two jacks they could have suspended the aircraft through the lifting tube "eyes".
 
The panel you scanned could have come from a K-46, but I have never seen this shape of closing panel on other Ki-46 aircraft, be them model-I, -II or -III, and as mentioned in the earlier email all standard access/working panels are approximately 11cm in size.
It is of course entirely possible that the standard "snap catch" cover was lost, and a fast fix Ki-51 panel was applied to this individual aircraft.
The fact that this panel is very small is still worrying, as any ground crew worth his salt could have fabricated at short notice a panel for this access point, in a matter of 1 hour or so?
 
Senior Technical Artist
Flight International Magazine
(Established 1909)
 
The Color of Dinah! Part 1 *PIC*
 
Posted By: James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
Date: Sunday, 8 September 2002, at 12:56 p.m.
 
Until recently, the true colors of the Mitsubishi Ki-46 II Dinah have been confined to color photographs of captured Dinahs, such as the view below provided by the late Al MAKIEL of one at Clark Airfield in 1945.
 
Editors note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_clarkfield.jpg
 
Photo: Albert F. Makiel via LRA
 
Dr. Charles "Bunny" DARBY provided the following photograph of a No.10 Hiko Sentai Dinah captured at Gasmata, New Britain I. by Australian troops:
 
Editors note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_gasmata.jpg
 
Photo: AWM via Charles Darby
 
During the 1970's Dr. DARBY discovered and studied many derelict Japanese aircraft in New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. On But Airfield, New Guinea, he examined the remains of a Ki-46 II, s/n 2406, which had been assigned to No.76 Dokuristsu Hiko Chutai (76 Fcs).
 
Editors note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_2406_but_a.jpg
 
Photo: (c) Dr. Charles Darby via LRA
 
DARBY observed that this Dinah had been painted overall gray-green (hairyokushoku) and that a dark green "squiggle" pattern of camouflage had been field-applied over all upper surfaces. The gray-green finish had oxidized to a blue-gray powder in many places. He removed the all-metal rudder trim tab and submitted it for analysis by this author and James I. LONG.
 
Editors note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_2406_but_b.jpg
 
Photo: (c) James I. Long via LRA
 
See details below of the yellow stripe, which had been applied by a coarse brush, over the trim tab and note the gray-green surface protected from oxidation/weathering by the coat of yellow paint which had cracked and peeled to reveal this layer of paint:
 
Editors note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_2406_76fc_relic_b.jpg
Editors note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_2406_76fc_relic_c.jpg
 
The color of this Dinah was analyzed to have been an overall, factory-applied gray-green (hairyokushoku), which, today, was a close match to FS-16350 (Munsell 5Y 6/2).
 
There was a field applied dark-green "squiggle" pattern over the top surfaces which was a close match to FS-34094 (Munsell 7.5 GY 3/2).
 
The yellow stripe of the No.76 Fcs unit marking was greatly faded. The yellow stripe, in its darkest hue, was a close match to FS-33538 (Munsell 10 YR 7/14).
 
Earth Brown paint for Dinah III ?
 
Posted By: Rob Killick <rkillick@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tuesday, 6 August 2002, at 6:32 p.m.
 
I'm hoping to build a Dinah III (Tamiya) 1/48 , but I'm somewhat at a loss as to what type , or who makes a suitable "Earth Brown" for the particular A/C I want to do .
 
Re: Earth Brown paint for Dinah III ?
 
Posted By: Mike Cavel <mcavel@tconl.com>
Date: Wednesday, 7 August 2002, at 9:31 p.m.
 
In Response To: Earth Brown paint for Dinah III ? (Rob Killick)
 
Steve Hustad, a contibutor to Fine Scale Modeler and a frequent winner in many categories at the IPMS nationals, recommended to me Humbrol #160 for the topside brown on a Ki-46III and Humbrol #28 for the underside gray. I haven't built Tamiya Dinah yet, but that's what I'll use.
 
Chokkyo and Dinah Ops in Malaya
 
Posted By: Nick Millman
Date: Tuesday, 30 July 2002, at 12:09 a.m.
 
The "Nitawara Flight Unit" received a citation for its army air co-operation work during the Malayan campaign. I presume Nitawara was the commander but does anyone know which Chokkyo unit this citation referred to? Was it the 83rd Independent Hikotai (consisting of 71st, 73rd and 89th Independent Chutai)?
 
In his memoirs of the campaign Masanobu Tsuji also refers to the "Miyashi air-military co-operation squadron" (sic), presumably another Chokkyo unit and said to be "under the command" of Staff Officer Kawashima, senior staff officer of the "3rd Air Group" (sic - Division). Can anyone help identify the Miyashi squadron?
 
Before the outbreak of war Tsubi flew a clandestine reconnaissance flight over Northern Malaya, taking off from Saigon in a Ki-46, with the hinomaru painted out, piloted by Captain Ikeda (49th Class at military college). At the time the 81st Sentai and 51st Independent Chutai were equipped with the Ki-46 and said to be based at Phnom Penh - the 50th Independent Chutai also operated the Ki-46 from Konpong Trach. Does anyone know which of these units was detached to the Air Divisional HQ and/or provided the aircraft and pilot for Tsubi's flight?
 
Oops! For Tsubi read Tsuji! *No Text*
 
Posted By: Nick Millman
Date: Tuesday, 30 July 2002, at 12:13 a.m.
 
In Response To: Chokkyo and Dinah Ops in Malaya (Nick Millman)
Return to Army Message Board