Mitsubishi Ki-46
"Dinah"
-
- Topics:
- For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color
*PIC*
- Paint Formulae: Iron vs Aluminum Surfaces?
- Early Ki 46 - II : anyone have pics ?
- ki46 wheel well detail
- Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker
- Dinah
and the IJNAF
-
Dinah bombs?
- Blue Dinah or Brown?
- Ki 46-III units
- Dinah demarkation
- A question on white Ki-46 III of 19th...
- KI 46 Details
-
Dinah Interior color
(New)
-
For
what it's worth/SAC green (New)
-
The Color of Dinah! Part 2
*PIC* (New)
-
The Color of Dinah! Part 1
*PIC* (New)
-
Earth Brown paint for Dinah III ?
(New)
-
Chokkyo and Dinah Ops in Malaya
(New)
-
-
- Posted By: James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
Date: Sunday, 24 December 2000, at 7:20 a.m.
-
- I thought that the members of the Japanese Army Aircraft Message Board would enjoy a color vignette of a Mitsubishi Ki-46 Dinah taken at Clark Field, February 1945.
- Compliments, at Christmas time, of the Japanese Navy Aircraft Message Board at J-Dot Com via the Albert F. Makiel Collection and
LRA.
- Editors note: The picture is not reproduced here.
-
- Re:Ki-46 Color/Effects of Weathering *PIC*
-
- Posted By: James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
- Date: Monday, 25 December 2000, at 8:02 a.m.
-
- Below you will see a scan from the fin of a Mitsubishi Ki-46 Dinah. This relic came from Ki-46 s/n 2406 and was collected from a No.76 dokuritsu hiko chutai wreck at But A/F, New Guinea by Charles DARBY in December 1972. It has been preserved since that time.
- Please note the effect of weathering. The original paint has faded to a chalky, almost white-gray surface as a result of binder deterioration and pigment fade.
- However, wherever the protective layer of yellow paint from the unit insignia has subsequently chipped off, the finish underneath has remained virtually unchanged. It is somewhat glossy hairyokushoku (gray-green) which is a close match to FS-16350. This was also true of the paint under removable panels which had been protected from the elements.
- The primer coat under the final paint application was a very dark flat gunmetal gray. This wreck also demonstrated a field-applied "squiggle" pattern of IJA olive drab (close to FS-34088) on the upper surfaces.
- The Clark Field Dinah in my original posting may have also been very weathered, but not to the same extent as this sample.
- Editors Note: Picture not reproduced
here
-
- Re: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color
-
- Posted By: Tony Feredo <aferedo@ibahn.net>
Date: Monday, 25 December 2000, at 3:30 a.m.
-
- In Response To: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color
*PIC* (James F. Lansdale)
-
- Great photo... What is the color scheme of this a/c (JA army green over JA grey or NMF?) What unit used this a/c?
-
- Re:Ki-46 Color/Effects of Weathering *PIC*
-
- Posted By: James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
Date: Monday, 25 December 2000, at 8:02 a.m.
-
- In Response To: Re: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color (Tony
Feredo)
-
- Below you will see a scan from the fin of a Mitsubishi Ki-46 Dinah. This relic came from Ki-46 s/n 2406 and was collected from a No.76 dokuritsu hiko chutai wreck at But A/F, New Guinea by Charles DARBY in December 1972. It has been preserved since that time.
- Please note the effect of weathering. The original paint has faded to a chalky, almost white-gray surface as a result of binder deterioration and pigment fade.
- However, wherever the protective layer of yellow paint from the unit insignia has subsequently chipped off, the finish underneath has remained virtually unchanged. It is somewhat glossy hairyokushoku (gray-green) which is a close match to FS-16350. This was also true of the paint under removable panels which had been protected from the elements.
- The primer coat under the final paint application was a very dark flat gunmetal gray. This wreck also demonstrated a field-applied "squiggle" pattern of IJA olive drab (close to FS-34088) on the upper surfaces.
- The Clark Field Dinah in my original posting may have also been very weathered, but not to the same extent as this sample.
- Editors note: The picture is not reproduced here.
-
- Re: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color
-
- Posted By: James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
Date: Monday, 25 December 2000, at 7:08 a.m.
-
- In Response To: Re: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color (Tony
Feredo)
-
- I do not know which unit this aircraft was attached to.
- The finish appears to be FS-36357 upper surfaces and a lighter lower surface color with a straight line separation of the upper surpace from the lower surface ("a la" Mitsubishi Ki-67 Peggy scheme).
- Color photography cannot be used to determine exact hues, but it does give a clue to the original color/s. Dinahs appeared in the greatest range of, apparently, factory-applied schemes I have catalogued.
- Is it possible that Dinah schemes "may" have been "custom-ordered" from Mitsubishi for specific units and/or theaters?
-
- Re: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color
-
- Posted By: Joern Leckscheid <Joern.Leckscheid@t-online.de>
Date: Monday, 25 December 2000, at 8:59 a.m.
-
- In Response To: Re: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color (James F. Lansdale)
-
- I have recently come up with a slightly unusual sounding theory as to the upper cammo paint used by Mitsubishi late in the war. As the company also manufactured tanks for the Army (Chi-Ha etc.), is it possible some tank greens and browns were also applied to later production examples of the Ki-46 and the Ki-67 at factory level? The paint used seems to have a matte appearance on the planes, same as on tanks.
I don´t really know much about tank colors, so is it a possibility?
-
-
- Posted By: James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
Date: Monday, 25 December 2000, at 11:51 a.m.
-
- In Response To: Re: For Dinah Lovers: Ki-46 Color
(Joern Leckscheid)
-
- Your theory sound good to me. It sure would have been expedient!
My only question would be; does it make any difference in adherence of the paint if the paint was formulated for application to an iron surface (tanks) and then also used for application to an aluminum surface?
I guess it might not matter if the proper primer were used. I need someone better versed in this subject than I am!
-
- Re: Paint Formulae: Iron vs Aluminum Surfaces?
-
- Posted By: Joern Leckscheid <Joern.Leckscheid@t-online.de>
Date: Monday, 25 December 2000, at 4:25 p.m.
-
- In Response To: Paint Formulae: Iron vs Aluminum Surfaces? (James F. Lansdale)
-
- And up pops the primer question once again! Any indication if Ki-46s and Ki-67s (Mitsubishi-built) were primed ´til the end? The thought of commonly used paints occured to me when I noticed that Gunze Mr. Color 132, "Earth Green", a tank color, looks suspicously like the color of the Ki-67 on the cover of MA 533. So who out there in j-aircraft.com land knows anything about Japanese tank colors?
-
- Re ki 46 colours
-
- Posted By: JC Carbonel <jc.carbonel@free.fr>
Date: Thursday, 28 December 2000, at 1:59 p.m.
-
- In Response To: Re: Paint Formulae: Iron vs Aluminum Surfaces?
(Joern Leckscheid)
-
- while we are speculating on ki 46 colours here is an idea (maybe a silly idea):
looking at the pics on page 63 of FAOW 38 I was surprised that the structure of the aircraft was visible while the aircraft appeared painted and I wondered if it could happen that an aircraft delivered in natural metal could be painted (on the field) in Aotake overrall ? This would probably give this see-through structure effect and could explain the various blue (especially the medium blue) aircraft (notably ki 46) in the Thorpe book .
Is this totally crazy or what ?
-
-
- Posted By: François P.WEILL <frpawe@wanadoo.fr>
- Date: Sunday, 8 October 2000, at 12:54 p.m.
-
- I have just bought the two Ki 46 Kits from Hasegawa (I'm a bit late to do so I know :))) ).
- I've reviewed whatever photographic documentation I have and I discovered that despite the fact the first Ki 46 - II's were produced around December 1941 (the few used before were the little known or represented Ki 46 - I's)I have no pics of of early Ki 46 - II but one (I suppose because the are represented in the same line as the earlier ki 15 - II) from the 2nd Sentai ...
- Hasegawa includes a decal for one a.c. of this Sentai but represents it having the yellow IFF stripes on the wings...
- I suspect those on the pics I've located didn't carry them when it was shot but ... And I have no idea where the second Sentai operated...
- Anyone knows ?
- I'd really like to built mine as a 1942 - 1943 period aircraft and beside the 2nd Sentai option, any good pic of an early Ki 46 - II in operational use, depicting the markings clearly enough will be welcome...
-
- Re: Early Ki 46 - II : anyone have pics ?
-
- Posted By: Elephtheriou George <elgeorge@otenet.gr>
- Date: Sunday, 8 October 2000, at 1:56 p.m.
-
- In Response To: Early Ki 46 - II : anyone have pics ? (François
P.WEILL)
-
- I think you definetely need the FAOW 38. There, you can find photos, profiles and many other things that are useful for building your model. (Photos of the Ki 46-I too).Also take a look at the "Emblems of the Rising Sun" for unit markings.
- Hope it helps,
-
- Re: Early Ki 46 - II : anyone have pics ?
-
- Posted By: Deniz Karacay <denizkaracay@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sunday, 8 October 2000, at 2:40 p.m.
-
- In Response To: Re: Early Ki 46 - II : anyone have pics ?
(Elephtheriou George)
-
- I have FAOW Ki46 issue but don't remember the number. It has black cover. If you tell me the pages for the photos Francois wanted I'll scan and send him.
-
-
- Posted By: Demirhan Denizyaran <dfdenizyaran@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sunday, 24 September 2000, at 3:22 p.m.
-
- I need Ki-46 wheel well details,can anybody help me please?
-
- Re: ki46 wheel well detail
-
- Posted By: Charles Metz <c-metz@uchicago.edu>
- Date: Wednesday, 4 October 2000, at 12:42 p.m.
-
- In Response To: ki46 wheel well detail (Demirhan
Denizyaran)
-
- Ki-46 wheelwell detail can be found in:
- Ashley: 'Mitsubishi Ki-46 "Dinah"' (Aircraft in Detail series, No. 1; Delta Aviation Publishing [UK], 1997; 32 pages; US$15) -- page 23
- and in:
- ------: 'Mitsubishi Ki-46' (Maru Mechanic series, No. 13; Maru [Japan], 1978; in Japanese; 80 pages; approximate value US$30 [out of print]) -- pages 24-27.
- Although these books are out of print, they're well worth searching for, in my opinion. The Maru Mechanic has been reprinted in "Mechanism of Military Aircraft #4" and is offered for sale on HobbyLink Japan's on-line catalog page at (http://www.hlj.com/cgi-local/manmenu2.cgi?manufacture=KJS), for example.
-
-
- Posted By: Frank Chr. Berger <frank_berger@directbox.com>
- Date: Friday, 25 August 2000, at 1:20 p.m.
-
- Who can tell me something about the quality of this kit?
Did they score against allied planes or were they simple more "fodder"?
- As far as i know one decal option is a attacker used in Manschuria and Japan.Action against russian troops?
I have a cool 1/48 T34/85 and want to combine it on a diorama with a downed IJAA aircraft.
-
- Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker
-
- Posted By: DANIS Jean-Charles <amar.derni@cfwb.be>
- Date: Monday, 18 September 2000, at 11:45 p.m.
-
- In Response To: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker (Frank
Chr. Berger)
-
- Does anyone knows if this Ki-46 version (with the large gun protruding from the roof) was produced in large numbers or was it an experimental version, built in small numbers,like the Ki-109 (Ki-67 with 75mm gun in the nose),soon to be released by Hasegawa.
-
- Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker
-
- Posted By: JC Carbonel <jean-christophe.carbonel@laposte.fr>
- Date: Monday, 25 September 2000, at 8:25 a.m.
-
- In Response To: Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker
(DANIS Jean-Charles)
-
- It seems the conversion of the Dinah to night-fighter version was not too successfull indeed but our dear William Green claims it was produced in "substantial numbers" and Francillon gives 10 different units (sentai) operating it from July 1944 (doubts since himself he says the proto flew in October 44)see Profile n°82.
-
- Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker
-
- Posted By: Ted Bradstreet <tbstreet@uninets.net>
- Date: Tuesday, 5 September 2000, at 9:13 a.m.
-
- In Response To: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker (Frank
Chr. Berger)
-
- I'm not sure exactly which version you are asking about. The "air defense fighter" (interceptor) armed with the upward-pointing 37 mm Ho-204 was "ineffective" (no known scores).
-
- Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker
-
- Posted By: Frank Chr. Berger <frank_berger@directbox.com>
- Date: Tuesday, 5 September 2000, at 12:36 p.m.
-
- In Response To: Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker (Ted Bradstreet)
-
- i'm interested in both.But since there were even less ground
support Ki-46s (only the 20mms + bombracks) than interceptors-they did have even fewer chances to score any kills,i think!
Do you have informations about kills/losses of Ki-67,H8K? I'm interested in following types(Ki-84,Ki-61,Ki-100,B6N1/2)
- Which ones are your favoured?
-
- Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker
-
- Posted By: Ted Bradstreet <tbstreet@uninets.net>
- Date: Tuesday, 5 September 2000, at 2:51 p.m.
-
- In Response To: Re: Ki-46 Interceptor/Attacker (Frank
Chr. Berger)
-
- Sorry. My interest is really the guns, so I only know about aircraft that carried guns I have
studied.
-
-
- Posted By: Grant Goodale <mailto:grant.goodale@sympatico.ca?subject=Dinah
and the IJNAF>
Date: Thursday, 23 August 2001, at 7:13 a.m.
-
- Hello world -
- The posting on the General forum
about the new Hasegawa releases tweaked my interest. They state that they
will be releasing a Ki-46 with IJN markings. I was looking in the A6M Zero
in Action book and they also show a photo of a Dinah parked in with
Zeroes. The caption identifies it as a Ki-46 assigned to the IJNAF.
- Were these Dinahs actually in IJN
Kokutai service or were they special IJAAF units attached to a certain
base? If they were true IJN birds, does anyone know what units they served
with?
- TIA
- - Grant
-
- Re: Dinah and the IJNAF
-
- Posted By: Allan Alsleben
<mailto:Wildcat42@AOL.com?subject=Re: Dinah and the IJNAF>
Date: Thursday, 23 August 2001, at 4:15 p.m.
-
- In Response To: Dinah and the
IJNAF (Grant Goodale)
-
- Hello Grant,
- The earliest unit I'm aware of was
the 76 FCS or Independent Chutai operating over Guadalcanal or the HQ unit
of the Brigade. When they mention HQ unit, I believe they are speaking of
the Brigade. It was Army, and the overflights were for Army information.
The 76FCS used the same strips that the IJN used while at Rabaul.
As far as I'm aware of, I've never heard of any Naval Unit being equipped
with Ki 46, as the Navy had the Type 2 Reconnaissance ("Irving")
airplane.
- FYI - Allan
-
- Re: Dinah and the IJNAF
-
- Posted By: Jim Broshot
Date: Thursday, 23 August 2001, at 10:09 p.m.
-
- In Response To: Re: Dinah and the
IJNAF (Allan Alsleben)
-
- Al:
- I am going to guess that this line
may be based on (who else) Francillon. In Profile No. 82 he states that
the IJNAF acquired "a small number" of Ki-46s. No exact date
given, Then he states, "Some JNAF Ki-46-IIs, flying from Timor
Island, were active over Northern Australia." No date and no unit
given. The same statements are repeated in his JAPANESE AIRCRAFT OF THE
PACIFIC WAR.
-
- Re: Dinah and the IJNAF
-
- Posted By: Larry <mailto:Hldeziv@aol.com?subject=Re:
Dinah and the IJNAF>
Date: Friday, 24 August 2001, at 6:33 a.m.
-
- In Response To: Re: Dinah and the
IJNAF (Allan Alsleben)
-
- Guys -
- There were a couple of units: 151
Ku had "a few" Ki-46 DINAHs during 1943 at Rabaul-Lakunai, and
on 26 March 1944 it still had one on strength that was serviceable. This
is from Mikesh/Tagaya (Moonlight Interceptor: Japan's IRVING Night
Fighter) and Sakaida (The Siege of Rabaul, p.27).
- Also, 171 Ku is said to have had
"a few" Ki-46 DINAHs at Kanoya NAS in May-July 1945 along with a
larger number of C6N MYRTs. 171 Ku flew L-R maritime reconnaissance
searches as well as radio countermeasures and deception flights for the
Kikusui special attack missions under 5th Air Fleet. This is from SRH-055
in Record Group 457/National Archives (Top Secret ULTRA sigint material).
- HTH
(Larry)
-
- Re: Kudos to Larry and Rick
-
- Posted By: Allan Alsleben
<mailto:Wildcat42@AOL.com?subject=Re: Kudos to Larry and Rick>
Date: Friday, 24 August 2001, at 8:23 a.m.
-
- In Response To: Re: Dinah and the
IJNAF (Larry)
-
- Hi guys,
- I knew that if anyone could
provide an answer, you both could. I just didn't have enough material to
say one way or the other.
- Other than 151, 202 and possibly
171, would it be too muchg to ask what other units?? I've noted those
mentioned with your source.
- Al
-
- Re: Kudos to Larry and Rick
-
- Posted By: Elephtheriou George
<mailto:arawasi_g@hotmail.com?subject=Re: Kudos to Larry and Rick>
Date: Friday, 24 August 2001, at 9:10 a.m.
-
- In Response To: Re: Kudos to Larry
and Rick (Allan Alsleben)
-
- Konnichi wa,
from FAOW 38, page 39, top photo:
photo taken end of Showa 17 (1942) at Rabaul airfield. The Navy received a
few Dinahs which opperated in the South Areas and the Mainland among
others. This Model II is camouflaged in deep green and has yellow IFFs on
the wing's leading edges. It opperated recon. missions over Guadalcanal
and P/N.G. areas.
- Domo,
George
-
- Re: Dinah and the IJNAF
-
- Posted By: richard dunn <mailto:rdunn@rhsmith.umd.edu?subject=Re:
Dinah and the IJNAF>
Date: Friday, 24 August 2001, at 7:57 a.m.
-
- In Response To: Re: Dinah and the
IJNAF (Larry)
-
- All
- Emphatically "yes" the
Navy operated Ki 46's. In addition to 151 Ku as noted by Larry on, March
1st 1943 the 23d Air Flotilla requested two Ki 46's with crews to be
assigned to 202 Ku. The Type 2 land recon a/c did not have the high
altitude performance to operate over Australia.
- I'd have to check my records for
other units operating the type. But definite on 151 Ku and probably 202.
- Rick
-
- Re: Dinah and the IJNAF
-
- Posted By: John Lundstrom <mailto:jl@mpm.edu?subject=Re:
Dinah and the IJNAF>
Date: Monday, 27 August 2001, at 10:09 a.m.
-
- In Response To: Re: Dinah and the
IJNAF (richard dunn)
-
- The Dinahs that operated from
Rabaul in October 1942 against Guadalcanal were definitely flown by the
JAAF's 76th Independent Air Squadron. One (flown by Capt. Kirita Hideo,
the chutai leader) crashed on 25 October right on Henderson Field.
Souvenir hunters swarmed the wreck and only about ten days later it was
noticed that the flight helmets bore the Army star. Consequently on 8
November 42 Halsey warned Nimitz that the IJA had planes in the South
Pacific Area.
-
-
- Posted By:
Ryan Boerema <ryann1k2j@aol.com>
- Date:
Monday, 25 March 2002, at 5:18 p.m.
-
- I
periodically come across the Ki-46, "Dinah," referred to as a
fighter-bomber, or bomber, or otherwise claims that it sometimes toted bombs.
I've never seen a photo of one doing so or of a bomb rack on a Dinah's
underside. Does anyone know?
-
-
Re:
Dinah bombs?
-
- Posted By:
Hiroyuki Takeuchi
- Date:
Monday, 25 March 2002, at 9:15 p.m.
-
- In Response
To: Dinah bombs? (Ryan Boerema)
-
- Two possible
reasons.
-
- 1)US
intelligence report during WW2 states that the Ki46 is also used a a bomber
(probably a confusion with Ki45).
-
- 2)Ki46
interceptors carried two "ta-dan" air-to-air bombs under the wings.
-
- I think the
Tamiya Ki46 interceptor kit includes the "ta-dan" bombs in the box.
-
-
Re:
Dinah bombs?
-
- Posted By:
Dan Salamone <heroncreek@pcisys.net>
- Date:
Tuesday, 26 March 2002, at 9:32 p.m.
-
- In Response
To: Re: Dinah bombs? (Hiroyuki Takeuchi)
-
- The Tamiya
Ki-46III kit does indeed include the "ta-dan" weapons. IIRC, there is
a photo in the FAOW that shows an aircraft ready for departure, carrying the
weapons as well.
-
-
Re:
fireworks
-
- Posted By:
Garth O'Connell <goconnell@dingoblue.net.au>
- Date:
Wednesday, 27 March 2002, at 11:08 p.m.
-
- In Response
To: Dinah bombs? (Ryan Boerema)
-
- Off on a
slight tangent, (which may be confused with bombs) was the use of 'fireworks'
dropped out of the Dinah to 'scare' or put off attackers - as what occurred
over Western Australia in 1943.
-
-
Re:
fireworks
-
- Posted By:
Hiroyuki Takeuchi
- Date:
Thursday, 28 March 2002, at 3:26 a.m.
-
- In Response
To: Re: fireworks (Garth O'Connell)
-
- Japanese
combat reports of the effectiveness of air to air use of ta-dan vary
considerably. Some (like Tetsuzo Iwamoto) claim it to be highly effective
weapon against heavy bombers while others state that it was too difficult to
aim and not very effective in combat (which seems to be the more popular
opinion).
-
- The fact
that its use was continued until the end of the war probably means that it was
believed to have some effectiveness, whether in terms of real damage to
airframe or as a means to disrupt formation prior to attack by ordinary
armament.
-
-
- Posted By:
Ryan Boerema <ryann1k2j@aol.com>
- Date:
Friday, 5 April 2002, at 10:20 a.m.
-
- On the
General Aircraft board a couple weeks ago Michael Cavcik translated the Polish
(http://www.j-aircraft.org/bbs/general_config.pl?read=9094) from a picture
posted by Deniz Karacay of a BLUE Dinah III, said to be the last P-47 victory,
by a Capt. Smith, 36FS, 8FG, over Hansa Bay, and one of the first Ki-46IIIs in
New Guinea.
- When I tried
to corroborate this in Stanaway & Hickey's "Attack and Conquer,"
Schiffer, 1995, they write that, indeed, on Feb 6, 1944 Capt. Bob Smith caught
the Dinah over Hansa Bay and "fired a single long seven second burst"
and his wingman "saw the wing of the Dinah burst into flame and the dark
BROWN reconnaissance plane crash below."
- Does anyone
have the combat report to see which color it was, or did it crash on land and
get inspected? Thorpe shows a very similar BLUE Dinah III for New Guinea as
well. Is this the same plane with two different color interpretations?
-
- One
vote for brown
-
- Posted By:
richard dunn <rdunn@rhsmith.umd.edu>
- Date:
Friday, 5 April 2002, at 3:25 p.m.
-
- In Response
To: Blue Dinah or Brown? (Ryan Boerema)
-
- Number 3 in
Smith's flight was 1st Lt John J. Perkins. He was making a pass at the aircraft
when Smith raked it from nose to tail and set it on fire. According to Perkins:
"The enemy airplane was of a dark brown color with large roundels on
either side of the wings and fuselage."
-
- I don't read
Polish but Deniz's post seems to indicate this blue aircraft was from 82
chutai. There was no 82 chutai in the 4th Air Army on February 6th, 1944 nor at
any other time that Army operated in New Guinea. Don't believe everything you
read whether in Polish, Turkish or English.
-
- Another
wingman 1st Lt George Slingmeyer says nothing about the aircraft's color. If it
were blue you think somebody would have mentioned it. How about the lighting?
The combat took place at 1220 hours and started above an overcast in clear sky.
-
- By the way
if anybody knows anything about blue Type 1 fighters (Ki 43) which were
captured at Gloucester and Hansa please let me know.
-
- Re:
One vote for brown
-
- Posted By:
Ryan Boerema <ryann1k2j@aol.com>
- Date:
Friday, 5 April 2002, at 5:18 p.m.
-
- In Response
To: One vote for brown (richard dunn)
-
- Well, that
settles that. Mr. Cavcik translated the Polish as stating, "Mitsubishi
Ki-46-III of 82. independent chutai. One of few planes of this version, that
arrived to the New Guinea. After bad success of other reconnaisance units, 82.
chutai was tranferred from Manchuria, where it shared airbase (and emblem) with
famous 18. sentai."
- Oh, those
elusive blue aircraft! Dinahs, Oscars, Sonias, Helens, Ki-100s, Ian K. Baker
even talks about gorgeous Georges using dark blue camouflage for over-water
patrols. Always just out of reach....
-
- Re:
One vote for brown
-
- Posted By:
Nick Millman
- Date:
Saturday, 6 April 2002, at 5:46 a.m.
-
- In Response
To: Re: One vote for brown (Ryan Boerema)
-
- I don't
think we should be too hasty in using this poor and easily refuted example of a
"blue" colour scheme as negative evidence of others. There are plenty
of RAF combat reports from Burma describing blue and black Japanese aircraft.
For example early in 1944 F/Lt J James of 607 Squadron damaged an Oscar with
dark blue paintwork, seeing it sufficiently clearly to note that it’s “very
red” roundels were outlined in a darker red.
-
- And if
colour perception during the stresses of air combat is too unreliable (as is
often argued) then F/Lt C D Horsman's painstakingly documented ATAIU
examination of abandoned Hayabusas at airstrips on Akyab island in early 1945
ought to convince that blue paint was available - and used. In addition to the
expected green mottles over natural metal, the following unusual aircraft were
recorded.
-
- Airframe
5869, a Hayabusa of the 50th Sentai's 3rd Chutai was found to be camouflaged
with a mixed mottle of green, brown, red and blue on all its upper surfaces.
The Sentai lightning flash had a thin red edging and there were two white
fuselage stripes.
-
- Airframe
5672 an Aikoku-Go Hayabusa of the 64th Sentai (donated by an electricity
company) was camouflaged in a carefully applied mottle of green and black.
-
- Several
Japanese sources also maintain that many Army aircraft operating in the China
Sea areas received a dark blue colour scheme, described as "kon-iro"
by veterans, possibly in connection with preparations for their increased
maritime operations along the Chinese coast from January to August 1945.
-
- I think the
subject deserves further research rather than dismissal.
-
- Good
Way of Thinking *PIC*
-
- Posted By:
Deniz Karacay <denizkaracay@yahoo.com>
- Date:
Thursday, 11 April 2002, at 8:22 p.m.
-
- In Response
To: Re: One vote for brown (Nick Millman)
-
- Well here is
another one, from SAMI September 2000;
-
- Ki43-III Ko,
20th Sentai, 3 Chutai, Formosa
-
- Editors
note: Picture no longer available
-
- blue
camo makes sense
-
- Posted By:
Carlos Sempere <ibiza109@inferno.com>
- Date:
Thursday, 11 April 2002, at 10:35 p.m.
-
- In Response
To: Good Way of Thinking *PIC* (Deniz Karacay)
-
- I would've
liked to have a plane in that color, given the surroundings. Proof or not, I'd
be surprised if blue was never used.
-
-
- Posted By:
Chris Cowx <ccowx@shaw.ca>
- Date:
Monday, 13 May 2002, at 3:40 p.m.
-
- I am
wondering if anyone knows anything about where the "Dokuritsu Hikotai,
55th Chutai" operated and when. Same for the "Hiko 10th Sentai, 1st
Chutai"
-
- Re:
Ki 46-III units
-
- Posted By:
Jim Broshot <jbroshot@fidnet.com>
- Date:
Monday, 13 May 2002, at 8:26 p.m.
-
- In Response
To: Ki 46-III units (Chris Cowx)
-
- Aircraft in
Profile No. 82 (Francillon) has for the following Ki-46 equipped units:
-
- 10th Sentai:
New Guinea, Rabaul, Formosa, Japan; 1943 - 1945
-
- 55th
Dokuritsu Dai Shijugo Chutai: Manchuria, China; Mar 1942 - Oct 1944
-
- Re:
Ki 46-III units
-
- Posted By:
Nick Millman
- Date:
Monday, 13 May 2002, at 11:57 p.m.
-
- In Response
To: Re: Ki 46-III units (Jim Broshot)
-
- Here's a
puzzle:
-
- According to
Monograph 151 the 55th was transferred from Manchuria to China on 15 February
1944.
-
- Trouble is -
the unit is not included in any of the lists for Manchurian based units before
that! Was it perhaps a product of the dreaded Dinah unit evolution where units
were consolidated, formed and re-formed?
-
- Re:
Ki 46-III units
-
- Posted By:
Chris Cowx <ccowx@shaw.ca>
- Date: Monday,
13 May 2002, at 11:00 p.m.
-
- In Response
To: Re: Ki 46-III units (Jim Broshot)
-
- Thank you
very much! Do you think that the -III's would have served in Rabaul or would
they not have entered service until the unit was in Formosa and Japan? I have a
picture showing a -II in IJN service in Rabaul about the summer of '43.
-
- Re:
Ki 46-III units
-
- Posted By:
Jim Broshot <jbroshot@fidnet.com>
- Date:
Monday, 13 May 2002, at 11:10 p.m.
-
- In Response
To: Re: Ki 46-III units (Chris Cowx)
-
- Alas, I am
only a rank amateur in this field. Francillon says, "Ki-46-IIIs, often
operating alongside Ki-46-IIs, covered the entire South-west Pacific and CBI
theatres of operations...." The color profiles of Ki-46-IIIs in the
profile are for: 2 Sentai, Philippines, Oct 1944; 81 Sentai, 3 Chutai, Burma
1944; 38 Sentai, Formosa, 1945, and 38 Dokuritsu Hikotai, 2 Chutai, Japan, July
- August 1945."
-
-
- Posted By:
Tracy White <whitet@blarg.net>
- Date: Sunday,
26 May 2002, at 11:31 p.m.
-
- Any idea if
the demarkation lines on Army Dinahs between the top and bottom color would be
sharp or feathered? I don't quite trust the RAF museum example...
-
- Re:
Dinah demarkation
-
- Posted By:
Don Marsh <marsh44@fuse.net>
- Date:
Monday, 27 May 2002, at 12:05 a.m.
-
- In Response
To: Dinah demarkation (Tracy White)
-
- You will
occassionally find a Dinahs with soft demarcation, but 99% of the time (if they
weren't an overall solid color) they appear to have had sharp demarcations.
Fairly consistent placment on the fuselage, but a lot of variations in
application on the nacelles.
-
-
- Posted By:
Donald Anderson <sundastrait@yahoo.com>
- Date:
Monday, 17 June 2002, at 5:41 p.m.
-
- Independent
Chutai 1944 as found in Thorpe's JAAF Camo book on p.135. Does anyone know of
the source for this artwork? I haven't been able to locate any photographs in
FAOW, Maru Mechanic, Peter Scott's book or the Thorpe book that show this
scheme. I'm sure I don't have all the material on the Ki-46 so any other
potential sources would be much appreciated.
-
- Re: A
question on white Ki-46 III of 19th...
-
- Posted By:
Don Marsh <marsh44@fuse.net>
- Date: Tuesday,
18 June 2002, at 3:31 p.m.
-
- In Response
To: A question on white Ki-46 III of 19th... (Donald Anderson)
-
- I've been
looking for a photo of this a/c for 4 years now. I believe this to be a
speculative art representation without photographic evidence. It may be based
on a word of mouth account, some intelligence report, or evolved from confusion
regarding a surrender a/c. Frankly, I'm dubious. Too bad, because I like this
19 Independant marking much more than the usual representation.
-
- Re: A
question on white Ki-46 III of 19th...
-
- Posted By:
Donald Anderson <sundastrait@yahoo.com>
- Date:
Wednesday, 19 June 2002, at 7:03 p.m.
-
- In Response
To: Re: A question on white Ki-46 III of 19th... (Don Marsh)
-
- Thanks for
the j-aircraft.com reply. Yes, I like the all-white scheme as well and thought
it interesting given that FAOW only mentions the green/grey, but I wouldn't be
surprised if the scheme is speculation either. Just hoping that I overlooked a
reference somewhere. I wonder if there is anything like an operational history
of the 19th Ind.Chutai available? The Ki-46 FAOW(p.61) mentions that at the
time of the Okinawa campaign a section of the 19th served under the control of
the IJN's 801 Ku. This makes me wonder further about possible camo schemes. Oh
well, keep poking around...
-
-
- Posted By:
jackson <FincherI@aol.com>
- Date:
Sunday, 23 June 2002, at 11:32 a.m.
-
- I'm just
putting the finishing touches on a Tamiya KI 46 with the oblique cannon and I
have two questions for our distinguished panel. How does the pilot's enclosure
open? I believe I have seen pictures of the center section hinging left to
right ala Bf109, would this be correct? Does anyone have information or photos of
the antenna wire installation?
-
- Memory
serves me that it may have run fron the cannon mount to the stabilizer.
-
- Re:
KI 46 Details
-
- Posted By:
Don Marsh <marsh44@fuse.net>
- Date:
Sunday, 23 June 2002, at 2:42 p.m.
-
- In Response
To: KI 46 Details (jackson)
-
- Yes, the
canopy was hinged on the starboard side of the fuselage, swinging over to the
starboard side, allowing postside entry. Similar to the Me 109, as you mention,
but... the Ki-46's canopy was also hinged in the top center of the canopy allowing
the canopy to sort of fold slightly flatter when swung over to the right. The
left side and corners didn't swing up into the air, as on a Me 109, but slid
along a track that followed the edge of the fuselage.
-
- The antenna
set up on this a/c is rather unique. The Antenna was joined to the cannon
itself (!) running from the center of the cannon back to the usual location on
the vertical fin tip. A small connecting wire runs glazing from the main
antenna wire down into the rear compartment through the glazing.
-
- I'll send
you a couple reference shots.
Posted By:
Pablo Maloberti <pablogmalo@speedy.com.ar>
Date:
Thursday, 19 September 2002, at 11:53 a.m.
I'm about to
start building Tamiya's recon Dinah and wonder about interior color.
Acording to
Tamiya instructions it's all in a yellow-green mix, including wheel wells. But
in an article in an old FSM magazine someone painted the inner fusalege in
aotake, and the rest (floor, seats...) in the green mix.
So how
should it be? Is Tamiya mix ok for the interior color?
Posted By:
Peter, <f14peter@yahoo.com>
Date:
Tuesday, 24 September 2002, at 10:52 a.m.
In Response
To: Dinah Interior color (Pablo Maloberti)
I painted
the interior of my recon Dinah with MM enamal SAC bomber green. It's a lighter
shade of green, not much saturation, and you might say that it has a hint of
yellow.
I primarily
picked it because; It was close enough for me; It's a different shade of green
than it seems like all other planes have; And it was on hand. My dedication to
color accuracy (If it's close, it's good enough for me) may not be as high as
yours, but I was satisfied with the color.
Re:
Dinah Interior color
Posted By:
Grant Goodale <grant.goodale@sympatico.ca>
Date:
Thursday, 19 September 2002, at 12:03 p.m.
In Response
To: Dinah Interior color (Pablo Maloberti)
Mikesh lists
the interior colour as being between FS 34127 and 34098. Since it is a
Mitsubishi aircraft, you could either go with the Tamiya mix or else use
ModelMaster Medium Green (FS 34102) straight out of the bottle.
or
Mr.Color126 *No Text*
Posted By:
Elephtheriou George <arawasi_g@hotmail.com>
Date:
Thursday, 19 September 2002, at 8:32 p.m.
In Response
To: Re: Dinah Interior color (Grant Goodale)
Re: Dinah
Interior color
Posted By:
Dave C. <dvdcl@hotmail.com>
Date:
Saturday, 21 September 2002, at 12:48 a.m.
In Response
To: Dinah Interior color (Pablo Maloberti)
Is the Gunze
Sangyo FS 34102 Green good also? Or does the Testors Model Master FS 34102
Green a better match? I am also building a Dinah also by the way. About the
wheel wells, were they painted interior green also as the Hasagawa kit
instructions specify?
Re:
Dinah Interior color
Posted By:
Grant Goodale <grant.goodale@sympatico.ca>
Date:
Saturday, 21 September 2002, at 7:40 a.m.
In Response
To: Re: Dinah Interior color (Dave C.)
I do not
have that Gunze paint so I cannot comment on the colour matching. However, if
both paints claim the same FS number, they *should* be very close.
I am not
sure about the wheel wells but I think that they should be aotake.
Re:
Dinah Interior color
Posted By:
Pablo Maloberti <pablogmalo@speedy.com.ar>
Date:
Saturday, 21 September 2002, at 11:14 a.m.
In Response
To: Re: Dinah Interior color (Dave C.)
I found this
pics of a restored Dinah.
http://www.clubhyper.com/reference/dinahdm_1.htm
Here the
wheel wells seem to be painted in aotake.
Posted By:
James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
Date:
Sunday, 8 September 2002, at 2:14 p.m.
When the
First Air Commando Group (then known as the "5318th Provisional Air
Unit") arrived in the CBI theater of operations, armorer, J. Buckley
("Buck") RADER, investigated the wreckage of a Mitsubishi Ki-46 II
Dinah that had been shot down by RAF Spitfires. One of these Dinahs (shown
below) was attached to the No.18 Dokuristsu Hiko Chutai.
Editors
note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_2696.jpg
Photo: NARA
via Buck Rader and LRA.
"Buck"
souvenired the access door for adjusting the elevator control cable located on
the starboard, rear fuselage of the Dinah (as shown in the photograph below,
just aft of the so-called "combat stripe"). Note that the round
access door has been un-latched and is hanging by the attached chain below the
open port.
Editors
note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_gasmata_b.jpg
Photo: Dr.
Charles Darby via LRA.
Buck
submitted this access door for analysis. It measured 8.8 cm.
Editors
note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_2696_cover_a.jpg
The outside
surface (as shown above) is painted in a gray-green (hairyokushoku) color which
is a close match to FS-14201/16350 (Munsell 5 Y 5/2) with gloss black kanji
stencils.
Editors
note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_2696_cover_b.jpg
The inner
surface (as shown above) has the letters "SDH" stamped in the metal
and it is painted with an opaque, lusterless, dark blue-black primer which is a
close match to FS-35042 (Munsell 5 B 2/1).
Credit:
Special thanks to J. Buckley Rader and Dr. Charles Darby.
Re:
The Color of Dinah! Errata? *PIC*
Posted By:
James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
Date:
Monday, 16 September 2002, at 4:50 a.m.
In Response
To: The Color of Dinah! Part 2 *PIC* (James F. Lansdale)
Joe
PICARELLA, Senior Technical Artist, Flight International Magazine, wrote to
say:
"Dear
Jim,
...
I saw your
interesting items on the Ki-46 on J.A.com. I hope that you do not mind me
saying but there are several inaccuracies in the description of the item shown.
1. The item
that you show is wrongly identified as to it's original location. You show it
to be the access door aft of frames station 25 (8,350mm). This is actually the
"lifting tube" access point, though to be precise there is no lifting
tube fitted to the Ki-46. Instead there are two built-up support 'eyes' fitted
to the 'working' face of said frame station 25. These eyes were covered by the
standard 'snap catch' door found on the Ki-46...
While it is
true to say that the trim cables do pass near to the Port side access panel,
there are in fact no turnbuckles or adjustable connections within working
distance. Only a tufnal fairlead is within reach, but this is a fixed item.
Either way, aircraft built earlier and later than the one you are referring to
carried the "snap catch" cover at this lifting point.
2. The Door
that you show is marked as 'Control Cable, Balance Tab, Elevator'. The only location
that this would be found on the Ki-46 is on the underside of the tailplane...
While I am
happy with this location, the paint and type of stencil. The shape and size of
this panel does cause me some concern. The aircraft you show, C/n 2696, was well
along the production run of 'standardised' K-46's. All aircraft right from the
prototype carried a mixture of the 'snap catch' type covers or round (11 cm Dia) covers with
'Dzus' fasteners for most access points. While these evolved
and migrated around the aircraft over the years, the type you show, with an
extended radius (or nipple) containing a 'Dzus' fastener is something that I
have never seen on the Ki-46. I have a photo of the tailplane underside of
aircraft C/n 2406, (an earlier aircraft) indicating that the 'snap catches'were
fitted.
While it is
possible that this is in fact from the Ki-46, and this would make an
interesting side note to the 'access and panels' section of the book, I am
worried by it, especially since it does match a control access cover found on
the Ki-51 tail cone."
I defer to
Joe, who knows far more than I about Dinah's anatomy! (;>)
Buck RADER
may have been mistaken about the aircraft type he souvenired in Burma.
Editors
note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-51_70fcs.jpg
If this
access cover came from a Ki-51, a Mitsubishi product, then the colors are still
indicative of the color application as used by that firm (shown above; Ki-51
assigned to No.70 Fcs, Hollandia, New Guinea, photo by D.G. Cooper via LRA).
However, I
am still puzzled by the "holes" (shown in the view below) forward of
the hanging cover and the larger one in front of the "combat stripe".
Where either
of these the "trestle here" openings?
The cover I
scanned may have come from some other location on the Dinah, perhaps under the
horizontal tail plane.
Thank you
Joe and I look forward to your book about Dinah "with the finah
linah"!
Credit: AWM
via Dr. Charles Darby and LRA
Editors
note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_gasmata_b.jpg
Re:
The Color of Dinah! Errata?
Posted By:
Joe Picarella <joe.picarella@rbi.co.uk>
Date:
Monday, 16 September 2002, at 8:26 a.m.
In Response
To: Re: The Color of Dinah! Errata? *PIC* (James F. Lansdale)
While I am
happy with this "in-field" promotion, the real editor of Flight
international, my boss would no doubt be shocked to hear of my promotion and
his fall from grace!
Re your
concern over the rear fuselage apertures and the "trestle here"
markings, the prior mentioned frame station 25, acted as the rear fuselage
trestle frame.
The fact
that the "trestle here" marking is in front of said aperture stems
from the fact that the lifting "eyes" were mounted on the working
face of this frame, which in the case of frame station 25 is the rear face.
The
"trestle here" stencil is therefore directly on top of the frame
centre line, with the centre radius of the lifting "eye" (and
therefore the centre of the access panel for the lifting "eye")
located 10cm aft of this "working" face.
In the
field, maintenance crews had the option to sit the aircraft on a support stand,
positioned under the "trestle here" markings. Alternately, with the
use of a lifting tube and two jacks they could have suspended the aircraft
through the lifting tube "eyes".
The panel
you scanned could have come from a K-46, but I have never seen this shape of
closing panel on other Ki-46 aircraft, be them model-I, -II or -III, and as
mentioned in the earlier email all standard access/working panels are
approximately 11cm in size.
It is of
course entirely possible that the standard "snap catch" cover was
lost, and a fast fix Ki-51 panel was applied to this individual aircraft.
The fact
that this panel is very small is still worrying, as any ground crew worth his
salt could have fabricated at short notice a panel for this access point, in a
matter of 1 hour or so?
Senior
Technical Artist
Flight
International Magazine
(Established
1909)
Posted By:
James F. Lansdale <LRAJIM@aol.com>
Date:
Sunday, 8 September 2002, at 12:56 p.m.
Until
recently, the true colors of the Mitsubishi Ki-46 II Dinah have been confined
to color photographs of captured Dinahs, such as the view below provided by the
late Al MAKIEL of one at Clark Airfield in 1945.
Editors
note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_clarkfield.jpg
Photo:
Albert F. Makiel via LRA
Dr. Charles
"Bunny" DARBY provided the following photograph of a No.10 Hiko
Sentai Dinah captured at Gasmata, New Britain I. by Australian troops:
Editors
note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_gasmata.jpg
Photo: AWM
via Charles Darby
During the
1970's Dr. DARBY discovered and studied many derelict Japanese aircraft in New
Guinea and the Solomon Islands. On But Airfield, New Guinea, he examined the
remains of a Ki-46 II, s/n 2406, which had been assigned to No.76 Dokuristsu
Hiko Chutai (76 Fcs).
Editors
note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_2406_but_a.jpg
Photo: (c)
Dr. Charles Darby via LRA
DARBY
observed that this Dinah had been painted overall gray-green (hairyokushoku)
and that a dark green "squiggle" pattern of camouflage had been
field-applied over all upper surfaces. The gray-green finish had oxidized to a
blue-gray powder in many places. He removed the all-metal rudder trim tab and
submitted it for analysis by this author and James I. LONG.
Editors
note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_2406_but_b.jpg
Photo: (c)
James I. Long via LRA
See details
below of the yellow stripe, which had been applied by a coarse brush, over the
trim tab and note the gray-green surface protected from oxidation/weathering by
the coat of yellow paint which had cracked and peeled to reveal this layer of
paint:
Editors
note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_2406_76fc_relic_b.jpg
Editors
note: Picture at http://www.j-aircraft.com/jiml/ki-46_2406_76fc_relic_c.jpg
The color of
this Dinah was analyzed to have been an overall, factory-applied gray-green (hairyokushoku), which, today, was a close match to FS-16350
(Munsell 5Y 6/2).
There was a
field applied dark-green "squiggle" pattern over the top surfaces
which was a close match to FS-34094 (Munsell 7.5 GY 3/2).
The yellow
stripe of the No.76 Fcs unit marking was greatly faded. The yellow stripe, in
its darkest hue, was a close match to FS-33538 (Munsell 10 YR 7/14).
Posted By:
Rob Killick <rkillick@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date:
Tuesday, 6 August 2002, at 6:32 p.m.
I'm hoping
to build a Dinah III (Tamiya) 1/48 , but I'm somewhat at a loss as to what type
, or who makes a suitable "Earth Brown" for the particular A/C I want
to do .
Re:
Earth Brown paint for Dinah III ?
Posted By:
Mike Cavel <mcavel@tconl.com>
Date:
Wednesday, 7 August 2002, at 9:31 p.m.
In Response
To: Earth Brown paint for Dinah III ? (Rob Killick)
Steve
Hustad, a contibutor to Fine Scale Modeler and a frequent winner in many
categories at the IPMS nationals, recommended to me Humbrol #160 for the
topside brown on a Ki-46III and Humbrol #28 for the underside gray. I haven't
built Tamiya Dinah yet, but that's what I'll use.
Posted By:
Nick Millman
Date:
Tuesday, 30 July 2002, at 12:09 a.m.
The
"Nitawara Flight Unit" received a citation for its army air
co-operation work during the Malayan campaign. I presume Nitawara was the
commander but does anyone know which Chokkyo unit this citation referred to?
Was it the 83rd Independent Hikotai (consisting of 71st, 73rd and 89th
Independent Chutai)?
In his
memoirs of the campaign Masanobu Tsuji also refers to the "Miyashi
air-military co-operation squadron" (sic), presumably another Chokkyo unit
and said to be "under the command" of Staff Officer Kawashima, senior
staff officer of the "3rd Air Group" (sic - Division). Can anyone
help identify the Miyashi squadron?
Before the
outbreak of war Tsubi flew a clandestine reconnaissance flight over Northern
Malaya, taking off from Saigon in a Ki-46, with the hinomaru painted out,
piloted by Captain Ikeda (49th Class at military college). At the time the 81st
Sentai and 51st Independent Chutai were equipped with the Ki-46 and said to be
based at Phnom Penh - the 50th Independent Chutai also operated the Ki-46 from
Konpong Trach. Does anyone know which of these units was detached to the Air Divisional
HQ and/or provided the aircraft and pilot for Tsubi's flight?
Oops!
For Tsubi read Tsuji! *No Text*
Posted By:
Nick Millman
Date:
Tuesday, 30 July 2002, at 12:13 a.m.
In Response
To: Chokkyo and Dinah Ops in Malaya (Nick Millman)