Yokosuka P1Y "Frances"
 
10 or 16 20mm cannons ?????
 
Posted By: Elephtheriou George <mailto:elgeorge@otenet.gr?subject=10 or 16 20mm cannons ?????>
Date: Sunday, 16 July 2000, at 11:02 a.m.
 
Hi all,
in Rene Francillon's "bible" "Japanese Aircraft of the Pacific War" he mentions that a P1Y was tested with 10 forward firing 20mm cannon. And another was projected with 16 20mm cannon. Does anybody know enything more about this? I mean, where were these 10 or 16 cannons positioned? And how many rounds? Could they be fired all at once? And finaly what was the purpose of this version?
 
Thanx
 
Re: 10 or 16 20mm cannons ?????
 
Posted By: Tennessee Katsuta <mailto:kinson-garments@on.aibn.com?subject=Re: 10 or 16 20mm cannons ?????>
Date: Sunday, 16 July 2000, at 8:52 p.m.
 
In Response To: 10 or 16 20mm cannons ????? (Elephtheriou George)
Hi, George.
According to Maru Mechanic, twenty 20mm guns were mounted in the fuselage directed downwards. There were two types of arrangements(the book doesn't go into details), and approx. 30 of them were built. Their purpose was to strafe B-29's on the ground.
 
IHTH
Tennessee
 
Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon
 
Posted By: Elephtheriou George <mailto:elgeorge@otenet.gr?subject=Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon>
Date: Monday, 17 July 2000, at 10:00 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon (David_Aiken)
 
Dear Tennessee,
thanx for the information from the Maru but it seems it's a bit in contrast with Francillon. There were 10, 16 or 20 cannons? Forward firring or diagonal?
Dear David,
thank you too for everything. The recoil was my first thought too. But how about the arangement of the cannons and their type? Oerlicons?
 
To all,
wouldn't it be a really odd to say the least model?
 
Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon
 
Posted By: David_Aiken <mailto:David_Aiken@hotmail.com?subject=Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon>
Date: Monday, 17 July 2000, at 8:41 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: 10 or 16 20mm cannons ????? (Bill Leyh)
 
Aloha All,
Osamu "Sam" Tayaga's father served in the IJN test unit which added these cannon to the P1Y. He flew in the middle seat on the missions to test fire the weapon system. As Sam is in a major move and out of pocket until late July/early August, I can only add a little bit which Sam or his dad told me in the late 1970s. The tests were conducted over the ocean near Tokyo. Before firing the weapons all crew tightened their seatbelts. When the trigger was pulled all of the diagonal cannon fired and the resultant recoil made Sam's dad's head hit the canopy, but there was many inches between the canopy and his head so the plane actually buckled in the middle! This conversion was intended for a one-way mission against the B-29 airfields at Guam/Saipan, but the airfields to be used by the P1Ys were occupied by the Allies before the mission could be accomplished.
 
Cheers,
David Aiken
 
Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon
 
Posted By: Ted Bradstreet <mailto:tbstreet@uninets.net?subject=Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon>
Date: Thursday, 20 July 2000, at 7:46 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon (Elephtheriou George)
 
Here's the promised hard data. Source is Japanese Air Weapons and Tactics, US Strategic Bombing Survey report, January 1947. I have found this to be a very reliable source, the data presented was carefully researched.
There were two versions of multi-gunned P1Ys. The first had seventeen (17, not 16 or 20) Type 99 guns in the bomb bay. Twelve of these pointed downward and forward. The rear five pointed downward and rearward. Thirty Ginga's were so converted. They were to be staged through Minami to attack the B-29 bases in the Marianas and to land at Truk. Minami was lost before the plan could be executed. It is unlikely that they were painted orange, since they were conversions and regarded as service aircraft. A "standard" late-war P1Y paint job is more likely.
The second variant had twelve (12, not 10 or 16) Type 99 guns in the bomb bay aimed to fire forward and downward in a concentrated cone. This variant was intended for defense against landing craft in the expected invasion of the Home Islands. No production numbers are given for this variant and it is unclear if it was developed as far as the 17-gun version.
Neither variant saw combat, but the 17-gun P1Y was made in numbers sufficient to qualify it as a service variant. I do not think that it would be particularly interesting to model, since the guns would most likely be fully concealed with the bay doors closed.
 
Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon
 
Posted By: Ted Bradstreet mailto:tbstreet@uninets.net?subject=Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon
Date: Thursday, 20 July 2000, at 3:09 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon (Elephtheriou George)
 
There were at least TWO different configurations with different gun counts, but I don't have my sources here. I will follow up with more data. The twenty-gun version mounted the guns in rows in the bomb bays. The guns were Type 99 Oerlikons, since the IJN didn't use any other twenties, but I'm not sure the exact gun model(s) is/are given in my best source, let alone ammo capacity. (I would expect them to be Mark 1 Model 3 guns with 100-round drums if there was enough space.)
Francillon is a VERY poor source of information on armament in general -- don't be too concerned that his information differs from that of better sources.
 
Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon
 
Posted By: Elephtheriou George <mailto:elgeorge@otenet.gr?subject=Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon>
Date: Thursday, 20 July 2000, at 3:53 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon (Ted Bradstreet)
 
Thank you so much Ted. A drum would be the most logical. But again, does the whole project sound logical to you? I'll keep in mind your advice about Francillon and wait anxiously for more information. Thanx again. Do you agree that it would be an interesting subject for a model? Makes me wonder about the plane's colors. An experimental-plane orange perhaps?
 
Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon
 
Posted By: Ted Bradstreet <mailto:tbstreet@uninets.net?subject=Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon>
Date: Thursday, 20 July 2000, at 7:56 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: P1Y Test w/diagonal downward cannon (Elephtheriou George)
 
The idea seems strange to us, but this was late in the war and the Japanese were both frustrated with their inability to reach the B-29 in the air and in terror of invasion. The IJN sought to use the materials it already had to deal with these problems. Remember too, despite the tale of the aircraft "flexing" under recoil, that the Oerlikon gun design is inherently quite low in recoil and therefore the best choice for such en masse installations.
 
P1Y Frances "YO-233"
 
Posted By: Anthony Noel <mailto:anoel@lonestar.utsa.edu?subject=P1Y Frances 'YO-233'>
Date: Friday, 2 February 2001, at 5:29 p.m.
 
Greetings;
A published photo of a KUGISHO P1Y Frances with the tail-code "YO-233", assigned to Yokosuka Kokutai, appears on page 14 of JAPANESE AIRCRAFT: CODE NAMES AND DESIGNATIONS by Robert C. Mikesh(1993 Schiffer Press), and on page 33 of BOMBS, TORPEDOES AND KAMIKAZES by John W. Lambert(1997 Specialty Press).
In addition to the tail-code "YO-233", this machine carries a single bar or stripe across the rudder. The tail and rudder of a second Frances is visible in the left-hand margin of the photo. This Frances carries the tail-code "YO-231" and the same single diagonal stripe across the rudder.
Does this single stripe across the rudder serve to indicate a "SHOTAICHO" (three plane flight command), or does it have another significance?
It is my understanding that in early 1944 Yokosuka Kokutai began to organize units for combat operations. Would the single diagonal stripe across the rudder of these machines serve to identify a particular operational HIKOTAI?
Any help with this question is sincerely appreciated!
 
Re: P1Y Frances "YO-233"
 
Posted By: Richard Campbell <mailto:muppyt@ihug.co.nz?subject=Re: P1Y Frances 'YO-233'>
Date: Saturday, 3 February 2001, at 7:05 p.m.
 
In Response To: P1Y Frances "YO-233" (Anthony Noel)
 
Hi Anthony,
It is my understanding that the diagonal stripe on the fin/rudder signified an ASV radar equipped aircraft.
A similar stripe appears on the fins of ASV equipped Q1W1 'Lorna's and G4M2 'Betty's'
Richard C.
 
Re: P1Y Frances "YO-233"
 
Posted By: Anthony Noel <mailto:anoel@lonestar.utsa.edu?subject=Re: P1Y Frances 'YO-233'>
Date: Sunday, 4 February 2001, at 1:04 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: P1Y Frances "YO-233" (Richard Campbell)
 
Hello Richard;
Thank you for the information, I appreciate your help!
I'm still not sure about the diagonal stripe across the rudder. For example, a photo of a Q1W1 LORNA, posted on this board courtesy of Mr. James Lansdale on 3 January 2001, has a diagonal stripe on the rudder slanted from upper-left to lower-right. Radar antenna are visible along the fuselage. On FRANCES "YO-233", the diagonal rudder stripe is slanted from upper-right to lower-left and radar antenna is NOT in evidence (at least as far as I can tell!).
Sincerely, Anthony
 
Re: P1Y Frances "YO-233"
 
Posted By: Grant Goodale <mailto:grant.goodale@sympatico.ca?subject=Re: P1Y Frances 'YO-233'>
Date: Sunday, 4 February 2001, at 5:58 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: P1Y Frances "YO-233" (Anthony Noel)
 
Anthony -
I had asked a question like this before based on a statement in Thorpe and other places which said that the diagonal stripe was radar related. Jim Lansdale (I think) indicated to me that the stripe was related to convoy protection and ASW operations. Some radar equipped a/c such as the Kate (KEB-306) had no diagonal stripe. Also, some convoy protection birds had the stripe but no radar.
FWIW
- Grant
 
Re: P1Y Frances "YO-233"
 
Posted By: Anthony Noel <mailto:anoel@lonestar.utsa.edu?subject=Re: P1Y Frances 'YO-233'>
Date: Monday, 5 February 2001, at 5:54 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: P1Y Frances "YO-233" (Grant Goodale)
 
Grant;
Thank you for the information! I have to admit however, that I'm still unclear on the status of FRANCES "YO-233".
Your information makes sense in terms of what I know on other aircraft engaged in ASW and/or Convoy Escort missions (NELL, KATE, LORNA, JAKE etc.) As far as I can remember, I do not recall any reference or citation for deployment of P1Y FRANCES on such missions. This is not to say it never happened, just that I don't know about it!
In reflecting on my original question, it now occurs to me that the captions for the photograph of FRANCES "Yo-233" do not indicate when this machine may have been operational. The fact that it was assigned to YOKOSUKA Kokutai (associated with testing and evaluation), may date this particular macine from anytime between, say mid-to-late 1943 to 1945. Therefore, any relevant information on service deployment of the P1Y FRANCES will be most sincerely appreciated!
Anthony
Return to Faq