Kawanishi N1K "Rex/George"
 
Topics:
George Color questions/comments
Kawanishi Dark Green
Jack and George - Naked?
Re: N1K1 Prototype
Early model Shiden Kai aces
George colors
Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green  
No.762 Ku N1K1-J George (Color!)
Modified Shiden-Kai/George for Carrier Ops...  
Kyofu Colour Query (New)
 
George Color questions/comments
 
Posted By: Steve Contella <mailto:contella@wt.net?subject=George Color questions/comments>
Date: Friday, 28 July 2000, at 8:17 p.m.
 
Here is a link to the HLJ page showing both the box art and completed model of Hasegawa's new George. Although it's kind of difficult to tell box art seems to show a body color that I would describe as blue-green. While the completed kit would indicate a color closer to an olive.
 
I'm not sure how many people have this book but, "The Great Book of WWII Airplanes" is in my library. It's a pretty old book but quite massive. Unfortunately it only details one Japanese aircraft the Zero. However there are several color plates in this section of other Japanese fighters. One of which is an early George N1K1 in a blue-green color. There is another color plate of the "Reppu" also in blue-green.
 
Is this a valid color? I've always seen the Goerge modeled in a dark IJN green color but the light olive on the HLJ site really threw me off.
 
Steve
N1K2 at HLJ
 
Re: George Color questions/comments
 
Posted By: Bill Leyh <mailto:hawk81@pacbell.net?subject=Re: George Color questions/comments>
Date: Friday, 28 July 2000, at 9:09 p.m.
 
In Response To: George Color questions/comments (Steve Contella)
 
Steve,
I know what you mean - that olive really threw me off when I first saw Hasegawa's photos. In the FAOW for the N1K series (#53) it specifies a color that translates literally to "deep green-black".
Model Art #272 includes a color chip thats supposed to be for Kawanishi aircraft. With colors as dark as this, doing a good match is difficult for me, but I think something on the order of FS34052 would be a close equivalent.
RLM 70 would get you closer to the dark 'blue-green' we've seen in some artwork.
My theory is that since the N1K2 series were built very near the Mitsubishi factory that built A6Ms they probably used the same paint supplied by the same manufacturer. I've seen at least one reference that indicates both the N1K2 and A6M were built in the same plant. In the color reference section of this site, James Lansdale published some work that matched Mitsubishi A6M5 dark green to FS34052.
Well, FS34052 is what I currently plan on using on my N1K2, anyway.
Hope this helps more than confuses!
 
Regards,
Bill
 
Kawanishi Dark Green
 
Posted By: James F. Lansdale <mailto:LRAJIM@aol.com?subject=Kawanishi Dark Green>
Date: Saturday, 29 July 2000, at 5:53 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: George Color questions/comments (Bill Leyh)
 
Steve and Bill:
At this moment I only have one sample of the dark green as applied by Kawanishi. It is not from a George, but from an Emily (s/n 426). This sample was provided to me by Shigeru NOHARA. His analysis was that the color was most like FS-34052. I have examined it under several lighting conditions and I lean more toward FS-34077. In the event, the two colors are both very close to each other.
 
IHTH
Jim Lansdale
 
Re: Kawanishi Dark Green
 
Posted By: Greg Springer <mailto:gspring@ix.netcom.com?subject=Re: Kawanishi Dark Green>
Date: Saturday, 29 July 2000, at 8:40 a.m.
 
In Response To: Kawanishi Dark Green (James F. Lansdale)
 
Hi Jim, Steve, Bill
FS *4077 is real close to the original topside color on the Kawanishi N1K1 Rexes at both Nimiz and Garber. A very deep black green. Recently 'rediscovered' fabric from an elevator of the Nimitz plane is a medium gray over aluminum dope. The aluminum is visible around the manufacturer stencil. I'll try to get an FS # on the gray within a month.
 
Cheers!
Greg
 
Jack and George - Naked?
 
Posted By: Bill Leyh <mailto:hawk81@pacbell.net?subject=Jack and George - Naked?>
Date: Sunday, 2 July 2000, at 2:44 p.m.
 
Hello all,
I've read several accounts of US fighter pilots encountering J2Ms and N1Ks in natural metal finish (no camo paint top or bottom). I understand that misidentification was a big problem for US. However, in at least one case, post-war research by Henry Sakaida identified the Japanese planes (described as being natural metal by the US pilots) as being Georges.
Looking through the FAOWs on these aircraft I only find one photo showing an NMF plane (Jack). Have any of you come across more examples of NMF late-war IJN fighters? It could make for an interesting modeling subject.
 
TIA and regards,
Bill
 
Re: Jack and George - Naked?
 
Posted By: Dave Pluth <mailto:dave@j-aircraft.com?subject=Re: Jack and George - Naked?>
Date: Sunday, 9 July 2000, at 11:19 a.m.
 
In Response To: Jack and George - Naked? (Bill Leyh)
 
Hi Bill,
It's my understanding that the NMF Jacks never flew in combat. The US had at least one that they flew on a test flight, but the engine seized on it and they ended up blowing it up.
 
-Dave
 
Re: Thanks Guys *PIC*
 
Posted By: Dave Pluth <mailto:dave@j-aircraft.com?subject=Re: Thanks Guys *PIC*>
Date: Monday, 10 July 2000, at 7:23 a.m.
 
In Response To: Thanks Guys (Bill Leyh)
 
Hi Bill,
If you want to do a NMF, just do it in US markings. There are also several George photos in US markings and NMF.
-Dave
 
Re: Thanks Guys
 
Posted By: Tim Hortman <mailto:thortman@epix.net?subject=Re: Thanks Guys>
Date: Monday, 10 July 2000, at 6:30 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Thanks Guys *PIC* (Dave Pluth)
 
Hey Dave,
Is the Jack yours? If so where did you come up with the TAIU tailcode markings? I've started one of the Tamiya N1K1 kits that I would like to do in a very similar scheme. Thanks,
 
Tim
Re: Thanks Guys
 
Posted By: Dave Pluth <mailto:dave@j-aircraft.com?subject=Re: Thanks Guys>
Date: Monday, 10 July 2000, at 9:19 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Thanks Guys (Tim Hortman)
 
Hi Tim,
I made the decals on my laser printer. I'm in the process of doing a few similar type birds. It's really easy.
-Dave
 
Re: NMF On Jack
 
Posted By: James F. Lansdale <mailto:LRAJIM@aol.com?subject=Re: NMF On Jack>
Date: Monday, 10 July 2000, at 5:42 a.m.
 
In Response To: Thanks Guys (Bill Leyh)
 
Bill
Take a look at FAOW No.61 p.p.2-3. I believe a similar photo appears in "Dead Birds and Meatballs." In the event, what is depicted is a recently delivered J2M Jack which has not been completely painted. In the haste to deliver it to a defense unit it was left in NMF. The dark green surround to the white outlined hinomaru was to permit less skilled labor finish the camouflage without "slopping" the paint on the outline. Notice too that the rudder fabric has been finished in camouflage scheme (as, I am sure were the ailerons and elevators).
I am fairly sure some of these birds may have seen action in the closing days of the war.
I have not seen any evidence of similarly finished N1K Georges.
 
Jim Lansdale
 
Re: Jack and George - Naked?
 
Posted By: Rob Graham <mailto:reishikisenguy@aol.com?subject=Re: Jack and George - Naked?>
Date: Sunday, 9 July 2000, at 9:28 a.m.
 
In Response To: Jack and George - Naked? (Bill Leyh)
 
Bill:
Let's not forget the many photos of the N1K1-Js that had lost most of their paint due to weathering. I wonder if this may have accounted for at least some of this.
I've seen a couple of these NMF Jacks as well, but don't recall seeing any NMF Georges.
 
--Rob
 
Re: N1K1 Prototype
 
Posted By: Don Marsh <mailto:marsh44@fuse.net?subject=Re: N1K1 Prototype>
Date: Wednesday, 26 July 2000, at 12:58 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: N1K1 Prototype (Drew Oliver)
 
Hi Drew,
It appears to me that the first few K-20s were painted in the experimental aircraft scheme of orange-yellow overall with black anti-glare.
A few notes about this scheme...
According to Donald Thorpe, Japanese Naval Air Force Camouflage & Markings of World War II: "During the period 1939 through 1944, most experimental aircraft, or at least the first few prototypes, were painted in the usual red-orange, or yellow-ochre, which was fairly universal between the JNAF and the JAAF. Aircraft that were placed on operational test status were usually painted in the same manner as those normally operational."
According to René Francillion, Japanese Aircraft of the Pacific War: "Experimental and training aircraft were initially painted training orange all over but, as their bases became frequent targets of allied aircraft, their upper surfaces were finished in dark green, training orange being retained on the lower surfaces. Finally, late in the war, these aircraft were camouflaged in the same way as the combat aircraft."
According to Model Art #272 (the newer #510 doesn't seem to reference this color), Camouflage & Markings of the Imperial Japanese Navy Fighters in WWII; experimantal/trainer orange-yellow (using Tamiya paints) is: 95% (X8) yellow + 5% (X7) red. The same mixture proportions are given for Gunze paints. Also, the same proportions also consistently given by individuals at this site in the "Color Research & Color Mixes" section of this J-aircraft site. The result is rather a light pumpkin color.
 
I suggest you consult with James Lansdale or other members of this board if you would like more updated info & FS color reference.
 
Don
 
Re: N1K1 Prototype
 
Posted By: Steve Contella <mailto:contella@wt.net?subject=Re: N1K1 Prototype>
Date: Thursday, 27 July 2000, at 11:35 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: N1K1 Prototype (Don Marsh)
On page 326 of Francillion's book, Japanese Aircraft of the Pacific War, there is a picture of a N1K2-J prototype in said overall orange (E18) with black anti-glare panel. Although the picture is in black and white you can see the aircraft is anything but dark green. I would think that it is reasonable to assume that the N1K1 prototype would have recieved the same paint scheme.
 
Steve
 
Re: N1K1 Prototype "YO"-N1K
 
Posted By: David_Aiken <mailto:David_Aiken@hotmail.com?subject=Re: N1K1 Prototype 'YO'-N1K>
Date: Thursday, 27 July 2000, at 3:00 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: N1K1 Prototype (Steve Contella)
 
Aloha All,
Have you seen the photo of the first prototype of the non-contra-rotating prop REX? The black tail code is "YO"-N1K. It is probably a light gray finish.
 
Cheers,
David Aiken
 
Re: N1K1 Prototype
 
Posted By: Cruiser K <mailto:cruiserk@wans.net?subject=Re: N1K1 Prototype>
Date: Sunday, 23 July 2000, at 6:30 p.m.
 
In Response To: N1K1 Prototype (Drew Oliver)
 
AirPower July 1994 has two photos of the Rex (Float Plane George) One in black and white and one in color. (If you can't get your hands on this out of print magazine let me know then I may be able to post scanned images for you. I was in the bookstore today and if you got to the aviation history section. I can't remember which magazine but it is the new ones for this month you will find a section on apanese floatplanes with the Rex Included. Also a color painting and black and white picture and 3 view drawing of the Rex can be found in the Rand McNally Encyclopedia of Military Aircraft. (You should be able to find this book at your local bookstore, used bookstore or public library).
 
Early model Shiden Kai aces
 
Posted By: gene cloud <mailto:nimbus109@earthlink.net?subject=Early model Shiden Kai aces>
Date: Tuesday, 26 September 2000, at 10:13 a.m.
 
Other than Kanno, can anyone offer some marking information of aces who flew the early version of this fighter [the new and really nice Hasegawa release]? BTW, did Kanno's plane sport any kill marks on the fuselage as indicated in some profiles?
 
Re: Kanno's Shiden Kai
 
Posted By: Cruiser K <mailto:cruiserk@wans.net?subject=Re: Kanno's Shiden Kai>
Date: Wednesday, 27 September 2000, at 7:23 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Early model Shiden Kai aces (gene cloud)
Yes after examination of a black and white photo
of 343-15 A it is now clear that it is the broad chord fin
that you refer to. I learn something new everyday. I had not really paid close attention to the Shiden or the Shiden Kai to find out that they had different vertical tail. Air
Group "343" nickname the squadron of Aces were quite successful with the Shiden-Kai some of the Aces that I sent to you used them well. CPO Hideo Nakao downed an F-6F and a P-51 flying the Shiden Kai. WO Katsue Kato became a "double ace" in a day flying the Shiden Kai for 343. Ens Kaneyoshi Muto downed 4 Hellcats flying the Shiden Kai. However without photographs like the black and white one of Kanno's Shiden Kai it may not be possible to tell which of these other aces flew the long chord type.
I will send a scan of the Ban-Dai model with kill markings if your e-mail is listed.
 
Cruiser K
 
Re: Early model Shiden Kai aces
 
Posted By: Cruiser K <mailto:cruiserk@wans.net?subject=Re: Early model Shiden Kai aces>
Date: Tuesday, 26 September 2000, at 9:41 p.m.
 
In Response To: Early model Shiden Kai aces (gene cloud)
Here is a list of Shiden Kai pilots with identification markings. (Note not all pilots and planes listed may be aces. However there are other known aces that flew Shiden Kai that I have no info on plane markings ex. Shoichi Sugita. I also don't know if these are the early version that you are specifying.
 
Dark Green top Light Gray or Natural Metal bottom Tail Code 343-45 C Two red fuselage stripes green and white spinner Air group 343, 701 Squadron piloted by Lt. Takashi Oshibuchi.
 
343-20 B Dark Green top Light Grey or Natural Metal bottom
shows 20 in Hinomura fuselage, 407 Squadron CPO Hideo Nakao.
 
Dark Green top Light Gray or Natural Metal bottom Tail Code
343-02 A , 303 Squadron CPO Katsue Kato.
 
Yo-104 Dark Green top Light Grey or Natural Metal bottom
Yokosuka Air Group Ens Kaneyoshi Muto.
 
343-27 B, Dark Green top Light Grey on Natural Metal bottom
White fuselage stripe rear of Hinomura WO Isamu Miyazaki.
 
343-33 A, Dark Green top Light Grey or Natural Metal bottom
brown spinner 301 Squadron CPO Mitsuo Hori.
 
(May not be Ace pilot)343-10 B, Dark Green top Light Grey or Natural Metal bottom 407 squadron PO1C Shojiro Ishii.
 
(May not be Ace pilot)343-32 C, Dark Green top Light Grey or Natural Metal bottom701 squadron PO1C Takumi Sugitaki.
 
Cruiser K
 
Re: Early model Shiden Kai aces
 
Posted By: Cruiser-K
Date: Tuesday, 26 September 2000, at 1:16 p.m.
 
In Response To: Early model Shiden Kai aces (gene cloud)
 
I am not certain which aces flew the mid-wing long landing gear Shiden-Kai N1K1. Muto flow the N1K2. There are other aces from 343 that flew the N1K2 as well. On Kanno's plane the Ban-Dai model at 1/24th scale sported kill markings of a B-29 and fighter aircraft in silhouette. However I have seen other models that show no kill markings. Also number in Hinomura was used for training purposes.
 
Re: Early model Shiden Kai aces
 
Posted By: John Dillon <mailto:john.dillon@wachovia.com?subject=Re: Early model Shiden Kai aces>
Date: Tuesday, 26 September 2000, at 3:12 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Early model Shiden Kai aces (Cruiser-K)
 
I think Gene means the broad-chord tailed Shiden-Kai, not the mid-winged Shiden N1K1 (no Kai). I just picked up the new Hasegawa kit this past weekend and am very impressed with the detail. It even has the tiny window aft of the aerial that helped illuminate the inside of the fuselage during servicing and maintenance.
 
John
 
Re: Early model Shiden Kai aces
 
Posted By: Cruiser K <mailto:cruiserk@wans.net?subject=Re: Early model Shiden Kai aces>
Date: Tuesday, 26 September 2000, at 10:16 p.m.
 
In Response To: Early model Shiden Kai aces (gene cloud)
 
Gene I finally figured out what you meant it appears that the first 100 N1K2 J were produced with the longer wider fin of the N1K1? I was under the impression that Kanno's George had there shorter narrower chord. That was the way it is represented in the model I built and in all other drawings that I have seen. (I don't know if any of the ace pilots and markings that I sent you are the larger fin.)
Cruiser K
 
Re: Early model Shiden Kai aces
 
Posted By: gene cloud <mailto:nimbus109@earthlink.net?subject=Re: Early model Shiden Kai aces>
Date: Wednesday, 27 September 2000, at 7:56 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Early model Shiden Kai aces (Cruiser K)
 
sorry I wasn't clear. I did mean the new Hasegawa N1K2J Shidenkai kit. Aeromaster presents Kanno's plane as one of the first 100 with the broad chord fin. Since this plane appeared in January '45, probably not too many had great success with this bird. Thanks for the help.
 
George colors
 
Posted By: Jeff <mailto:chipdog@fuse.net?subject=George colors>
Date: Sunday, 10 December 2000, at 8:13 p.m.
 
After reading the FAQ's about the George, I still have a question. Were the undersides NMF or grey? It seems from one response that there was a question of which is correct.
 
Re: George colors
 
Posted By: François P. WEILL <mailto:frpawe@wanadoo.fr?subject=Re: George colors>
Date: Monday, 11 December 2000, at 3:56 a.m.
 
In Response To: George colors (Jeff)
 
Jeff,
What George are we talking about ? George 11 (Kawanishi N1K1-J series) or George 21 (Kawanishi N1K2-J series)
As your question has no simple answer.
 
From what I was able to gather about those planes the changeover from undersurface gray-green (Most probably FS 36307) to NMF occurred during the production run of N1K1-J Ko Model 11 Ko series). The different finishes could be identified as follows:
1 - Planes 36307 (or another gray) undersurfaces have the area below the tailplane connected to undersurface color (like the later N1K2-J
2 - NMF undersurface planes have a triangular shape of NMF below the tailplane isolated from the general undersurface NMF by a green filet...
The only remaining question is to know if (like in Model Art 510 drawings) the aileron undersurface of NMF planes was gray or aluminum painted ... And this goes for both the N1K1-J series and for the N1K2-J series alike.
 
Now all N1K2-J (at least operational ones) were NMF on the undersurfaces. as Bill told you.
The Aero Detail on N1K2-J presents a contradictory report on the finish of aileron undersurface to the Model Art 510. The two Georges still existing are aluminum painted there instead of gray...
 
Now my personal guess (purely speculative).
 
When the switchover from gray undersurfaces to NMF occured during the production run of N1K1-J 11 Ko, some machines might have received ailerons already finished with the original gray paint (usual practice for a fabric covered element, often more or less subcontracted). Then as the stock of finished ailerons depleted, I think more likely that the new ones were finished according to the new undersurface aspect in aluminum dope.
Why ? Just because delivering NMF planes with gray-green fabric covered parts is typically an Army practice and Kawanishi never produced a single plane for the Army. When a number of other Navy types switched to NMF undersurfaces late in the war it seems that, as when it was the case during the period metallic planes were delivered unpainted (or kept that finish on the undersurfaces, like G3M's and G4M's, during all the conflict), they were delivered with aluminum doped fabric covered parts ... I see no obvious reason for Kawanishi to have proceeded otherwise...
 
Hope it helps
Françoi
 
Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green
 
Posted By: Francisco "Frank" Garcia <mailto:iraides.francisco@netabc.com.br?subject=Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green>
Date: Sunday, 11 March 2001, at 7:16 p.m.
 
Dear all
I am just finishing a Shiden type 11 from Tamiya, and ordered the new Shiden-kai from Hasegawa.
I painted my type 11 in Aeromaster´s Acrylic Kawanishi Green, but noticed that Shiden-kai models are often painted in a darker green. Is this correct? If it is, which shade should I use?
 
Thanks in advance for the help.
 
Re: Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green
 
Posted By: Ken Glass <mailto:ken.glass@eudoramail.com?subject=Re: Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green>
Date: Tuesday, 13 March 2001, at 3:50 p.m.
 
In Response To: Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green (Francisco "Frank" Garcia)
 
Hello Frank,
I have no first hand experience with a N1K and can only speculate based on Francois' comments in his posting. I do not know if the same paint was used on all Kawanishi plane production. The following is a proposed method to attempt to find out.
I have some top side dark green paint chips taken from the H8K Emily while it was at NAS Norfolk, VA in the late 1970s. The chips are chalked and faded. That said they match well those I obtained from Mr. Naoaki Ooishi in 1999. He obtained his in the early 1980s from the same machine after it had been transfered to Japan. He saw it while it was being stripped and restored to its present condition for outdoor display there.
 
I performed a careful examination of the H8K chips I have in strong sun light, from about 12:30PM to 2:30PM on a spring day in 2000 and concluded the following. I found no close FS595B match. The best match was an AeroMaster acrylic paint, stock #1190 'Nakajima Navy Green'. My #1190 paint chip on a piece of white index card almost exactly matched the chalked H8K paint chips, a dark blue-green color. The #1190 model paint is much darker than the AeroMaster #1188 'Japanese Kawanishi Green' you reported using on your N1K1 kit.
 
Overcoating the AeroMaster #1190 paint chip with a clear gloss masks the bluish tint apparent in the model paint. The glossed chip is then seen as a dark green.
If you accept the idea in Francois' posting that all Kawanishi dark green paint was the same, then you may want to consider the following. The H8K was a flying boat subjected to sea water and the attendant corrosion. The N1Ks were land planes without direct contact with the corrosive effects of sea water. If the dark green paint was all the same, then the N1Ks may have had a greener appearance, especially if the finish is still showing some signs of gloss or sheen. H8Ks may have looked the same as N1Ks when its paint work was new. But over time, as the effects of corrosion take their toll, the H8K will likely take on a bluish tint to its dark green, finally degrading to the chalked dark-blue green state of the remaining paint chips.
 
Perhaps Greg Springer and David Aiken, with access to the Rex at the Nimitz Museum, can weigh in here. There is a recent N1K restoration, at Pensacola I believe and another Rex at the Garber Facility in DC. Can someone with access to the N1K or a Rex compare an AeroMaster #1190 paint chip in flat and glossed states to original chips of paint found on the N1K and Rex during the restorations?
The big assumption here (among several) is that the original Kawanishi, and more recent vintage AeroMaster paints, behave similarly with respect to the presence of a glossing agent.
 
Has anyone made a study of paint chips from a Rex, H8K and N1K, all side by side for comparison? Jim Lansdale saw this before posting and said he had no N1K chips either, only some from the same H8K. An indirect comparison using the AeroMaster #1190 model paint as a 'control' may be the best way to proceed here.
 
If Francois is right, then the following results could arise. The H8K and Rex paint chips should resemble the flat state of the AeroMaster paint while the N1K may resemble the flat or glossed state of the model paint chip depending on the condition of the original N1K paint sample available for inspection.
If no strong correlation is found, we may have to conclude the Kawanishi dark green paint situation was similar to that of A6M production. A6M colors varied through a range of gray-greens and dark greens in use at the various production lines and over time.
 
Ken Glass
 
Re: Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green
 
Posted By: Ken Glass <mailto:ken.glass@eudoramail.com?subject=Re: Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green>
Date: Tuesday, 13 March 2001, at 3:23 p.m.
 
In Response To: Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green (Francisco "Frank" Garcia)
 
Hello Frank,
I have no first hand experience with a N1K and can only speculate based on Francois' comments in his posting. I do not know if the same paint was used on all Kawanishi plane production. The following is a proposed method to attempt to find out.
 
I have some top side dark green paint chips taken from the H8K Emily while it was at NAS Norfolk, VA in the late 1970s. The chips are chalked and faded. That said they match well those I obtained from Mr. Naoaki Ooishi in 1999. He obtained his in the early 1980s from the same machine after it had been transfered to Japan. He saw it while it was being stripped and restored to its present condition for outdoor display there.
 
I performed a careful examination of the H8K chips I have in strong sun light, from about 12:30PM to 2:30PM on a spring day in 2000 and concluded the following. I found no close FS595B match. The best match was an AeroMaster acrylic paint, stock #1190 Nakajima Navy Green. My #1190 paint chip on a piece of white index card almost exactly matched the chalked H8K paint chips, a dark blue-green color.
Overcoating the AeroMaster #1190 paint chip with a clear gloss masks the bluish tint apparent in the model paint. The glossed chip is then seen as a dark green.
If you accept the idea in Francois' posting that all Kawanishi dark green paint was the same, then you may want to consider the following. The H8K was a flying boat subjected to sea water and the attendant corrosion. The N1Ks were land planes without direct contact with the corrosive effects of sea water. If the dark green paint was all the same, then the N1Ks may have had a greener appearance, especially if the finish is still showing some signs of gloss or sheen. H8Ks may have looked the same as N1Ks when its paint work was new. But over time, as the effects of corrosion take their toll, the H8K will likely take on a bluish tint to its dark green, finally degrading to the chalked dark-blue green state of the remaining paint chips.
 
Perhaps Greg Springer and David Aiken, with access to the Rex at the Nimitz Museum, can weigh in here. There is a recent N1K restoration, at Pensacola I believe and another Rex at the Garber Facility in DC. Can someone with access to the N1K or a Rex compare an AeroMaster #1190 paint chip in flat and glossed states to original chips of paint found on the N1K and Rex during the restorations?
 
The big assumption here (among several) is that the original Kawanishi, and more recent vintage AeroMaster paints, behave similarly with respect to the presence of a glossing agent.
 
Has anyone made a study of paint chips from a Rex, H8K and N1K, all side by side for comparison? Jim Lansdale saw this before posting and said he had no N1K chips either, only some from the same H8K. An indirect comparison using the AeroMaster #1190 model paint may be the best way to proceed here.
If Francios is right, then the following results could arise. The H8K and Rex paint chips would resemble the flat state of the AeroMaster paint while the N1K may resemble the flat or glossed state of the model paint chip depending on the condition of the original N1K paint sample available for inspection. If no stong correlation is found then we may have to conclude the situation was similar to A6M production with a range of gray-greens and dark green
 
Re: Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green
 
Posted By: Greg Springer <mailto:gspring@ix.netcom.com?subject=Re: Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green>
Date: Tuesday, 13 March 2001, at 4:35 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green (Ken Glass)
 
Frank and Ken,
My experience with the Nimitz Rex 24 years ago and again in the last two years showed the few traces of upper side green paint to be a very dark green. This was limited to a masked-over fuel tank filler point stencil and and a small access plate for bore sighting the cowl guns. Both were very worn. The Nimitz plane was stripped and repainted per NASM guidelines and the color recommended was FS *4052, a very black green. Nimitz has a piece of original fabric from a control surface of their Rex and it is similar to *6307 gray but lighter and with less blue tint. The Pensacola Rex was repainted in a black green upper color. Their N1K2 is quite dark green as well. The P'cola Rex has a very light gray on the undersides as does the Nimitz plane. Neither gray is close to the original fabric color. Sorry, I'm an enamel user so I don't have any Aeromaster acrylics lying around to test.
 
Cheers!
Greg
 
Re: Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green
 
Posted By: François P. WEILL <mailto:frpawe@wanadoo.fr?subject=Re: Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green>
Date: Monday, 12 March 2001, at 12:38 a.m.
 
In Response To: Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green (Francisco "Frank" Garcia)
 
Hi Frank (Francisco).
To this date Kawanishi green has not been depicted by matching it to FS or Munsell reference.
Not so far ago, Jim Lansdale posted an excellent color pic of US origin of a Shiden captured in the Philippines.
I submitted this pic to some color balance corrzction under Photoshop and sent it back to Jim. As I have no u.r.l. to repost it, I think Jim can post the corrected version.
 
The yellow dominant which appeared through years of existence of that color pic is gone on the corrected version and I think it could give a fairly good approach of what was Kawanishi version of IJN dark green.
 
There is to date absolutely NO indication Kawanishi used more than one reference for its own green. Of course like any paint it could have been slightly different from batch to batch... But these kind of variation are barely noticeable unless you're facing a very instable color (Like US Olive Drab 41 for axample).
But BEWARE of B&W picture interpretation ! There are too much factors influencing the final aspect of a B&W picture to draw extensive conclusions by looking at them and each stage of their reproduction is a potential "error generator".
 
I think it is perfectly safe to use a generic Kawanishi green for any aircraft factory painted by this manufacturer, considering our present knowledge of the Japanese manufacturer's practices for IJNAF planes. Batches small variations (which will remain beyond our capabilities to record forever) each manufacturer used one generic green variant for its own factory finish ...
 
I hope it helps
François
 
Re: Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green
 
Posted By: Dan Salamone <mailto:heroncreek@qwest.net?subject=Re: Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green>
Date: Monday, 12 March 2001, at 6:59 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Shiden vs. Shiden-Kai green (François P. WEILL)
 
Hi Francois,
Hope you are well! FWIW, Model Art #510 gives the upper color on the Rex as well as the Shiden and Shiden Kai as "D1", which translates to FS 34077. Hope this helps,
 
Dan
No.762 Ku N1K1-J George (Color!)
 
Posted By: Martin <mailto:mgrant@hei.com?subject=Re: No.762 Ku N1K1-J George (Color!)>
Date: Tuesday, 19 June 2001, at 2:30 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: No.762 Ku N1K1-J George (Color!) (Cruiser K)
 
You know, we've all seen pics of Raidens, Georges and Zeros galore rotting at Atsugi and other places in 1945, 46 etc. Then they were eventually cut up and SCRAPPED! *sob* What a waste... Whew! Speaking of Georges, I've read in later years where Sakai called the Shiden or George a "second rate aircraft from a second rate company. (Kawanishi) Hmm...in Samurai, he seemed to be quoted as saying it made the JNAF Pilots (vets all) "hungry for blood again". Wonder what his real opinion is. Some writers and interveiwers seem to put words in his mouth or maybe, just maybe time has altered his opinion. What was the opinion of the US Pilots that found themselves in combat with the George? Sometimes I think that although the George may or may not be what it was reputed to be, some of those old time vets that flew them (Like Muto) could have and did achieve victories against superior numbers of Hellcats/Mustangs etc even in the "outmoded" Zero. It was more a case of Pilot Superiority some say, than the George's superiority. Any opinions, Cruiser or anyone?
 
Cheers!
=Martin
 
Posted By: Cruiser K <mailto:cruiserk@wans.net?subject=George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)!>
Date: Tuesday, 19 June 2001, at 3:31 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: No.762 Ku N1K1-J George (Color!) (Martin)
 
Hello Martin,
Good to hear from you also. I have also read that later comment by Sakai-san that ther George was a second rate aircraft. I will not attempt to guess why he said that, with the exception of mentioning that Sakai disliked Genda, and the elite class of Naval Graduates that looked down on the NCO's,Petty Officers, and Airmen. (See movie Zero Pilot) if you haven't for a glimpse of this perspective. While I agree and respect Sakai's opinion on most things I will draw the line with the George. Genda's choice of formation of Air Group 343 and his choice as the George as the key fighter were all good choices in my opinion. The only bad decision regarding this airplane was not getting it produced faster. The N1K2 simplified the construction process and made the landing gear shorter to help fix the problems associated with it. The George had a 1,990 hp engine, the engine did give some teething problems but it was powerful, the George featured 4- 20 mm cannon. It featured a new technology mercury tube combat manuever flap that gave it great manuevarability. The George was a great airplane in my opinion and was Japan's answer to the Zeroe's inferiority problem with the Hellcat. George was bigger, stronger and more powerful than the Zero and bested the Grumman Hellcat. At approximately 3/4 the size of the Hellcat and engine power nearly equal, the power to weight ratio was much better than in the Hellcat. (If the plane's manufacturer was second rate, getting Mitsubishi and other aircraft manufacturers involved in simplifying the design would resolve that issue)
 
Yes it was flown by a lot of elite pilots that I am sure helped it reputation, and added to its legend, but It was also a good plane with good flight characteristics for novice pilots (I believe, has anyone heard different!)
 
Sakai-san was a test pilot also and flew some prototypes, I will have to look again to see if he flew the George and what was his opinion earlier on after flight testing. Could be also that he like other Imperial Navy Pilots that learned to master the Zero, were hard to accept a plane with less handling, I have read somewhere that the Zero had to have been one of the better planes for a novice combat pilot. It would definitely spoil a person with its sweet handling and sweet flight characteristics. Muto, Sakai, and other late war surving aces did possess great skill to master these later war types Jack, George, etc. but a combination of more production of these types and veteran pilots training rookies how to exploit the advantages of these types would have been a little better for Japan in the closing years of the war. It took to long for 343 and the George to be introduced into combat in my opinion.
 
Cruiser K
 
Posted By: Martin <mailto:mgrant@hei.com?subject=Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)!>
Date: Tuesday, 19 June 2001, at 3:44 a.m.
 
In Response To: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)! (Cruiser K)
 
Hi Cruiser! 
I tend to share your opinion. Sakai-san is definately an expert if there ever was one, but he could have opinions shaded by personal feelings like the rest of us. I've read where he alledgedly called Genda an "idiot". Hmm... By the way, what became of Genda after the war?
 
The George was smaller than a Hellcat? It looks so HUGE in many photos! Wow! I thought it was almost as big as a P-47. Yet, I'd heard that it could best a Hellcat, and I didn't know if it was a better dogfighter or just had elite Pilots. Now I know. Thanks for the information!
 
Cheers!
=Martin.
 
P.S. We all know what affection Mr.Sakai had for the Zero, and who could blame him?
 
Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)!
 
Posted By: Martin <mailto:mgrant@hei.com?subject=Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)!>
Date: Wednesday, 20 June 2001, at 7:35 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)! (Cruiser K)
 
Hello Cruiser!
Yea, I knew the Hellcat to be smaller than a Jug, but I guess the barrel shape of the George and what appears to my eye a dissporportianatly small canopy made it look bigger. Would be interesting to see it alongside a Hellcat or something to get an idea of scale. I'm not a modeler, maybe I should be....*grin*
I bet the George caught some Hellcat pilots by surprise when it made it's combat debut. When/where was that anyway? Anyone know the results of that first combat?
 
Cheers!
=Martin
 
Posted By: Cruiser K <mailto:cruiserk@wans.net?subject=Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)!>
Date: Tuesday, 19 June 2001, at 8:34 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)! (Martin)
 
Hello Martin,
It is good to see we share the same opinion!
Genda survived the War, became a christian and wrote a book.
Ask other board members for the title of this book if I am correct, I believe it is God's Samurai or something like that and can be found at Amazon.com
 
Yes the George was slightly smaller than the Hellcat.
Escuse my earlier estimate it is more like 5/6 the size counting weight or 9/10 the size on dimensions alone. Both planes are bigger than the Zero, and of course you already know this, I am just mentioning it becase I built a 1/24th Bandai model of a A6M5c and a 1/24th of a N1K2J and the difference is size with the two models next to each other is significant, making the George a big plane. But both George and Hellcat were smaller than P-47. Specs from fighting aircraft of WWII list the 
 
George as 6,299 lbs. empty, 10,714 lbs. loaded, and 39ft 3 -1/4" wingspan, 30ft 8-1/4" length, and 13' high.
 
Hellcat list as 9,042 lb empty, 12,186 lbs loaded, and 42' 10" wingspan, 33' 7" length, and 13' 1" high. with 2,000 hp Pratt&Whitney.
 
Sincerely,
Cruiser K
 
Fuchida or Genda?
 
Posted By:  <mailto:2000GT-B@mui.biglobe.ne.jp?subject=Fuchida or Genda?>
Date: Wednesday, 20 June 2001, at 8:18 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)! (Cruiser K)
 
Hi Cruiser K,
May I correct one part of your posting?
That was Fuchida who became a Christian, NOT Genda. (According to OIDE, Hisashi's "The War and Peace of Fuchida Mitsuo" (Tokuma Bunko), Fuchida once said to his friend Capt. SUZUKI, Eijiro that "I'm a FAKE Christian." and made Suzuki laugh.)
Both of them wrote many books about the IJN aviation and the Pacific War. Most of them are available in Japan.
 
Best regards,
Katsuhiro
 
Re: Fuchida or Genda?
 
Posted By: UCHIDA, Katsuhiro <mailto:2000GT-B@mui.biglobe.ne.jp?subject=Re: Fuchida or Genda?>
Date: Thursday, 21 June 2001, at 7:59 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Fuchida or Genda? (Cruiser K)
 
Thank you for your reply, Cruiser K,
Yes, Fuchida was the Flight commander of Kido Butai at that time.
Both Genda and Fuchida went to Naval Academy (52nd graduation class) and Naval Institute (Tokyo) same time.
Genda joined JASDF after the war and assigned as the Chief of Staff, JASDF.
After Genda retired JASDF, he became a politician.
 
Best regards,
Katsuhiro
 
Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)!
 
Posted By: Cruiser K <mailto:cruiserk@wans.net?subject=Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)!>
Date: Wednesday, 20 June 2001, at 10:41 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)! (Martin)
 
I read in Japanese Naval Aces and Fighter Units that Air
Group 341, Squadron 701 Shidens did not fare so well against P38's and P-47s at Leyte. (They were overwhelmed)
I am not sure if this was the first engagement.
 
Cruiser K
 
Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)!
 
Posted By: Hiroyuki Takeuchi
Date: Monday, 25 June 2001, at 12:02 a.m.
 
In Response To:  (Cruiser K)
 
Hi Cruiser
It's hard to judge performance of aircraft types just from battle records especially in Leyte. Ask any Japanese pilot who served in Leyte in 44 and he will tell you that everything (logistics, intelligence, etc. ...like France in 1940 or worse) was in chaos and there was no chance no matter what you flew. The entire strategy was changed immediately before the operations beased on wrong assumptions.
Bad logistics coupled with constant raids and guerrilla attacks on airbases did not help the problem-prone Shidens either.
I do agree though that the Shiden was a stop gap design and was not until the completion of the -Kai that it became completely efficient
 
Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)!
 
Posted By: James Holloway <mailto:fholl46282@aol.com?subject=Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)!>
Date: Tuesday, 19 June 2001, at 11:31 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)! (Martin)
 
Sirs, 
I really think the negative comments towards the George refered to the first model and not to the Shiden Kai. It had quite a few problems with engine and the longer landing gear. Other vets like Fujita Isozu were a little more clear in their dislike when the George first came out and how they liked the later models, especially the ability to spray more cannon shells at the enemy. I think Sakai Saburo ,who lived in the Zero for so long would always prefer the zero to all others until a 'Super Zero" came along. Sincerely, James Holloway
 
Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)!
 
Posted By: Hiroyuki Takeuchi
Date: Tuesday, 19 June 2001, at 7:38 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: George One Heck of a plane (My opinion)! (James Holloway)
 
JASDF Gen.(Ret.) Ryoichi Yamada, former Shiden pilot told me that the Shiden 11 had a vicious trait to flip over and go into auto-rotation during tight turns. So you had handle it with care; it was not pilot friendly like the Zero.
 
As for Shiden 21, the handling apparently was improved, and Mr. Yoshio Shiga, who served as development pilot for both the Shiden-kai and the Reppu (A7M), commented that the Shiden-kai had a rugged structure and heavy armament, which made it very combat worthy. He also said the Reppu was a beautiful machine with fine handling characteristic like the Zero, but that the Shiden-kai was a meaner combat machine.
 
Modified Shiden-Kai/George for Carrier Ops...
 
Posted By: George of the Jungle
Date: Friday, 28 September 2001, at 12:09 p.m.
 
For you plane buffs who are more familiar with this plane's performance, would it have been feasible to have modify any of the IJNs' Georges/Shiden-Kai land-based fighters for Carrier use?
George "del bosque"
 
Re: Modified Shiden-Kai/George for Carrier Ops...
 
Posted By: Rob Graham <mailto:reishikisenguy@aol.com?subject=Re: Modified Shiden-Kai/George for Carrier Ops...>
Date: Friday, 28 September 2001, at 10:12 p.m.
 
In Response To: Modified Shiden-Kai/George for Carrier Ops... (George of the Jungle)
 
George:
YES (and NO):
N1K3-A Shiden-Kai 2 Model 41; None built (?)
N1K4-A Shiden-Kai 4 Model 42; One prototype built.
Source:
Japanese Aircraft of the Pacific War; Rene Francillon; ISBN 0-87021-313-X
Feasibility was surely a question, though, as Japan had few carriers left at the time, and this may have been the main reason the Shiden-Kai was never actively pursued in this role.
 
--Rob Graham
 
Re: Modified Shiden-Kai/George for Carrier Ops...
 
Posted By: Hiroyuki Takeuchi
Date: Saturday, 29 September 2001, at 3:26 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Modified Shiden-Kai/George for Carrier Ops... (Rob Graham)
 
According to Minoru Akimoto two examples each of N1K3-A and N1K4-A were built and carrier tests were carried out in November 1944 aboard the carrier Shinano.
 
Re: Modified Shiden-Kai/George for Carrier Ops...
 
Posted By: Masuaki Endo <mailto:endo_ijn@hotmail.com?subject=Re: Modified Shiden-Kai/George for Carrier Ops...>
Date: Friday, 28 September 2001, at 5:38 p.m.
 
In Response To: Modified Shiden-Kai/George for Carrier Ops... (George of the Jungle)
 
S! George!
I can only speak from modest experience. I believe the idea was considered by the IJN but the especially long landing gear struts on the N1K2's were not conducive to the rigors of carrier operations. The designers scrapped the idea altogether because of the need for Georges as bomber interceptors. As I understand it the N1K1 Shiden-Kai was used primarily to go after B-29's.
Luckily for the allies the Japanese couldn't produce enough of these fine fighter planes nor man them with enough skilled pilots at the end of the war.
*bows*
 
Shosa Masuaki Endo
Tainan Kokutai
 
Re: Modified Shiden-Kai/George for Carrier Ops...
 
Posted By: Rob Graham <mailto:reishikisenguy@aol.com?subject=Re: Modified Shiden-Kai/George for Carrier Ops...>
Date: Friday, 28 September 2001, at 10:18 p.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Modified Shiden-Kai/George for Carrier Ops... (Masuaki Endo)
 
Masuaki:
I THINK the N1K2-J would have been better off than N1K1-J. I am not sure about N1K2-J, though, whether it would have been any good or not.
As the N1K1-J was the model with mid-wing and it had the long and articulated landing gear, not unlike Grumman's F8F Bearcat.
 
--Rob
 
Kyofu Colour Query
 
Posted By: Daryl Johnson <mailto:todarylandtara@msn.com?subject=Kyofu Colour Query>
Date: Monday, 24 June 2002, at 1:55 p.m.
 
I was looking through Rene Francillon's book "Japanese Aircraft of the Pacific War" and noticed that the Kawanishi N1K1's photographed were either a light grey or natural metal. Neither airframe has a dark cowling nor counter-rotating props. One is moderate-to-heavily weathered.
What is the proper colour for these aircraft and what is the story behind it.
Thanks kindly for your knowledge,
Daryl Johnson
 
Re: Kyofu Colour Query *PIC*
 
Posted By: James F. Lansdale <mailto:LRAJIM@aol.com?subject=Re: Kyofu Colour Query *PIC*>
Date: Thursday, 27 June 2002, at 9:41 a.m.
 
In Response To: Kyofu Colour Query (Daryl Johnson)
 
Hi Daryl
The Kawanishi N1K1 "Rex" (Kyofu) on p.318 of the FRANCILLON book is either the N1K1 Rex, s/n 514, presently undergoing restoration at the Garber Facilities (NASM), in Silver Hill, Maryland or the N1K1 Rex s/n 562, at the Nimitz Museum in Fredericksburg, Texas.
See photos below of Rex s/n 514 (which, I believe, were taken by Tim HORTMAN). This Rex has been painted several times as evidenced by the photos. The original finish was overall gray-green (note color beneath the numerals) and then the top wing surfaces and fuselage were painted dark green (while in IJNAF service). The original code which appeared on the tail was ["YO"G-1001] in white and designated its assignment to No.903 Kaigun Kokutai for anti-submarine and escort duties.
There are many views taken throughout the years of both Rexs to be found in the Walk-around section of J-A Dot Com. Click below the photo for these scenes.
Please note both have been overpainted several times after capture, including aluminum and USN blue!
HTH
Jim Lansdale
 
Re: Kyofu Colour Query
 
Posted By: Elephtheriou George <mailto:arawasi_g@hotmail.com?subject=Re: Kyofu Colour Query>
Date: Monday, 24 June 2002, at 7:21 p.m.
 
In Response To: Kyofu Colour Query (Daryl Johnson)
 
Konnichi wa,
FAOW #53 has some EXCELLENT photos of operational Kyofu together with photos of the prototype with his "orange" colour and the counter-rotating propelers.
Domo,
George
 
Re: Kyofu Color
 
Posted By: David Aiken <mailto:David_Aiken@hotmail.com?subject=Re: Kyofu Color>
Date: Monday, 24 June 2002, at 2:48 p.m.
 
In Response To: Kyofu Colour Query (Daryl Johnson)
 
Aloha Daryl,
There are two photos of the N1K1 in the Kyofu section of Francillon's book. Page 317 is just after capture with an operational scheme sans tail code ...page 318 is a Kyofu on exhibit years later at Willow Grove NAS in a fictional scheme.
The Kyofu I worked on in 1975-6, now exhibited at the Nimitz Museum, had a neutral gray undersurface with green upper surface... The "tiny markings" had masking tape over them, with rare exception and showed this neutral gray undersurface...the few "tiny marking" areas [and the factory stencil area] which had been exposed revealed that the neutral gray color had changed.
HTH,
Cheers,
David Aiken
 
Re: Kawanishi Neutral Gray: Kyofu Color
 
Posted By: David Aiken <mailto:David_Aiken@hotmail.com?subject=Re: Kawanishi Neutral Gray: Kyofu Color>
Date: Thursday, 27 June 2002, at 9:31 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Yes, neutral gray: Kyofu Color (David Aiken)
 
Aloha All,
The topic of this thread is a Kawanishi bullt airplane and the unique observation made separately by both Greg and I in our recording of the tiny markings.
In 1975-6, I had the opportunity to obtain the AOK to remove the masking tape covering the various "tiny" stencil markings on an airframe which had been overpainted with USN paint. Yet, many of these markings had already been uncovered: the manufacture stencil, for example. These which had been exposed prior to my arrival showed a change in the color possibly affected by the atmosphere. Greg noted the undersurface color change, on the markings which I had revealed, in his repeated treks to the airframe.
How this affects the Mitsubishi A6M2 hypothesis promoted by Mr Lansdale is not the issue. The Kawanishi undersurface color shift reveals a characteristic that needs to be addressed in the study of Japanese paints.
HTH,
David Aiken
 
Re: Nimitz Kyofu Color in good condition
 
Posted By: David Aiken <mailto:David_Aiken@hotmail.com?subject=Re: Nimitz Kyofu Color in good condition>
Date: Thursday, 27 June 2002, at 10:26 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Kawanishi Neutral Gray: Kyofu Color (David Aiken)
 
Aloha All,
In Greg Springer and my analysis of the Nimitz Museum REX [albeit a much later serial], it was in good condition, being protected by the USN paint and the masking tape covering of the "tiny" markings which protected the actual colors quite well.
Of interest, the Kawanishi Neutral Gray was the expected color in the 1970s. The exposed undersurface color -which is similar to select colors in other hypotheses- was quickly understood by those on the scene as a chemical reaction of the paint with exposure to the air.
While the sole approval source for color continues to be sceptical of any other observation, Mr Jim Long was also an early visitor to view the Nimitz REX, his photography surely should add weight to these observations, if he photographed the tiny marks.
Cheers,
David
 
Re: Yes, neutral gray: IIDA's Zero Also? *PIC*
 
Posted By: James F. Lansdale <mailto:LRAJIM@aol.com?subject=Re: Yes, neutral gray: IIDA's Zero Also? *PIC*>
Date: Thursday, 27 June 2002, at 7:32 a.m.
 
In Response To: Re: Yes, neutral gray: Kyofu Color (David Aiken)
 
Thank you David for clearing-up the issue of the Nimitz Museum Kyofu color!
On the other hand, the Kyofu at Silver Hill has a gray-green (hairyokushoku ?) finish applied immediately to the primer coat.
Speaking of the "neutral gray" color you and Greg SPRINGER found on the Nimitz Kyofu, your research also provides evidence that the IIDA Zero [BII-151 ?], which was shot down at Kaneohe Bay 7 December, also had a "neutral" or "nonspec grey bottom,..."!
While this "Confidential" report also supports the "greenish-khaki" (hairyokushoku/ameiro/"grey-poupon"/I3/J3, whatever!) colors found on the relics from several aircraft shot down at Pearl Harbor, this is the first time I have seen your documentation for two-tone Zeros!(See below)
Perhaps this explains why the carrier I.D. bands on the fuselage of Pearl Harbor Zeros did not go all the way around the bottom, but possibly ended at the "nonspec grey bottom" demarcation line where it merged with the "greenish-khaki color topside".
It is also possible that this report is not too accurate, as you will note that the IIDA Zero also is stated to have been sporting a "red band around (the) fuselage". SORYU aircraft, [BI-] identifier, have been documented as sporting a single "blue" fuselage band!
At least three of the Zero relics examined are from the bottom surfaces of the IIDA and HIRANO Zeros and these relics are the same color as the top surfaces, i.e. "greenish-khaki," not "nonspec grey".
Also see Greg SPRINGER's analysis/photos of the IIDA Zero fin sample at the Nimitz Museum in the Research Section of J-A Dot Com.
Click on the link below the document you cite for a view of Greg's superb model of the IIDA Zero on display at the IIDA memorial in Japan.
Thank you for your continued support of this research.
Jim Lansdale
Return to Navy Message Board Threads